Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Radiopacity and Filler Content of Dual-Cure Resin Core Material, Dual-Cure Resin Cement, and Bulk-Fill Resin
Lcl Mendoza1, T S Peres2, Idg Estevão3
1Lilibeth Carola Leyton Mendoza, DDS, MSc, PhD student, Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil. Universidad Mayor San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolívia.
Objective:
This study evaluated the effect of filler content and composition on the radiopacity of different resin-based materials used to cement fiberglass posts (dual-cure resin cements or dual-cure resin core materials) and build the core (bulk-fill or dual-cure core resin composites) to restore endodontically treated teeth.
Methods And Materials:
Nine resin-based materials were tested: Four dual-cure resin core materials: Allcem Core, FGM; LuxaCore Z, DMG; Rebilda DC, VOCO; and Clearfil DC Core Plus, KURARAY; three dual-cure resin cements: RelyX Universal, 3M Oral Care; RelyX U200, 3M Oral Care; and Allcem Dual, FGM; and two bulk-fill resin composites: OPUS Bulk Fill APS, FGM; and Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M Oral Care. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, %) was performed to determine the filler content. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to evaluate the filler morphology and composition. Radiopacity was measured using digital radiographs (n=10) according to ISO 4049 standards. TGA and radiopacity data were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05).
Results:
Except for Luxacore Z, the dual-cure resin core materials and bulk-fill resin composites had higher filler contents than the dual-cure resin cements (p<0.001). Allcem Core exhibited more homogeneous fillers without agglomerates, whereas RelyX Universal presented only nanoparticles. OPUS Bulk Fill APS, Allcem Dual, and Allcem Core, made by the same manufacturer, presented similar sizes, shapes, and distributions of filler content. EDS analysis revealed that oxygen O (8), Si (14), C (6), Al (13), and Ba (56) were the most prevalent elements. The radiopacity of the tested materials is related to the presence of high atomic number elements such as Yr (70), La, (57), Ba (56), Zr (40), Sr (38), and Br (35) in their filler composition. All materials satisfied the ISO 4049 radiopacity requirements.
Conclusions:
Results were product-specific. Except for LuxaCore Z and Allcem Core, dual-cure resin core materials exhibited filler content similar to that of bulk-fill resin composites and higher than that of dual-cure resin cements. All materials exceeded the ISO 4049-2019 standard for radiopacity of restorative materials.
More Related Videos
05:42Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
Restorative Care
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...