Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Investigating Clinicians' Intentions and Influencing Factors for Using an Intelligence-Enabled Diagnostic Clinical
Rui Zheng1, Xiao Jiang2, Li Shen3
1Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Background:
An intelligence-enabled clinical decision support system (CDSS) is a computerized system that integrates medical knowledge, patient data, and clinical guidelines to assist health care providers make clinical decisions. Research studies have shown that CDSS utilization rates have not met expectations. Clinicians' intentions and their attitudes determine the use and promotion of CDSS in clinical practice.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to enhance the successful utilization of CDSS by analyzing the pivotal factors that influence clinicians' intentions to adopt it and by putting forward targeted management recommendations.
Methods:
This study proposed a research model grounded in the task-technology fit model and the technology acceptance model, which was then tested through a cross-sectional survey. The measurement instrument comprised demographic characteristics, multi-item scales, and an open-ended query regarding areas where clinicians perceived the system required improvement. We leveraged structural equation modeling to assess the direct and indirect effects of "task-technology fit" and "perceived ease of use" on clinicians' intentions to use the CDSS when mediated by "performance expectation" and "perceived risk." We collated and analyzed the responses to the open-ended question.
Results:
We collected a total of 247 questionnaires. The model explained 65.8% of the variance in use intention. Performance expectations (β=0.228; P<.001) and perceived risk (β=-0.579; P<.001) were both significant predictors of use intention. Task-technology fit (β=-0.281; P<.001) and perceived ease of use (β=-0.377; P<.001) negatively affected perceived risk. Perceived risk (β=-0.308; P<.001) negatively affected performance expectations. Task-technology fit positively affected perceived ease of use (β=0.692; P<.001) and performance expectations (β=0.508; P<.001). Task characteristics (β=0.168; P<.001) and technology characteristics (β=0.749; P<.001) positively affected task-technology fit. Contrary to expectations, perceived ease of use (β=0.108; P=.07) did not have a significant impact on use intention. From the open-ended question, 3 main themes emerged regarding clinicians' perceived deficiencies in CDSS: system security risks, personalized interaction, seamless integration.
Conclusions:
Perceived risk and performance expectations were direct determinants of clinicians' adoption of CDSS, significantly influenced by task-technology fit and perceived ease of use. In the future, increasing transparency within CDSS and fostering trust between clinicians and technology should be prioritized. Furthermore, focusing on personalized interactions and ensuring seamless integration into clinical workflows are crucial steps moving forward.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Current Trends in Nursing II
Patient-centered Care
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Critical Thinking II

