Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
The Impact of Standardized Operating Room Process Versus Dedicated Team on Outcomes in Pediatric Spinal Deformity
Vishal Sarwahi1, Effat Rahman1, Katherine Eigo1
1Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY.
Study Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to identify and compare the effectiveness of a regularized operating room (OR) process versus the utilization of a consistent "scoliosis team" for improving outcomes associated with pediatric spinal deformity surgery.
Summary Of Background Data:
OR standardization has garnered significant attention as a critical strategy for enhancing surgical safety and outcomes. The benefits of OR standardization are significant in complex surgical fields. Previous studies have shown that standardized care protocols can decrease surgical time and costs for spine surgeries. Maintaining a dedicated team can be difficult, but a process can be easily implemented at most institutions.
Materials And Methods:
Patients operated on during the study period were divided into two groups based on the type of standardization applied: the dedicated Team group (2018-2022) and the standardized Process group (2023-2024). The dedicated Team group included surgeries performed by a consistent team of OR staff, all following the standardized surgical process. The standardized process divides the surgical procedure into three phases: exposure, screw insertion, and correction. This process reduces the number of trays and instruments required. The Process group was formed in 2023 when new ORs did not maintain a dedicated team.
Results:
Surgical time (224 vs . 260 min; P <0.001) and LOS (3 vs . 4 d; P <0.001) were significantly lower for Process compared with Team. Total morphine consumption (123.0 vs . 132.2 mg; P =0.028) and OR costs ($10,819 vs . $12,558; P <0.001) were also significantly lower for Process. Thirty-day and 90-day complication rates were not significant between the groups ( P =0.71; P =0.43).
Conclusion:
A complex procedure like posterior spinal fusion can be standardized in a manner that can invite more staff to participate. Based on the results of this study, a standardized process alone can be beneficial in improving patient outcomes.
