Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Prognostic indicators and survival rates in vulvar cancer: insights from a retrospective study
Tharinee Rahong1, Panitta Sitthinamsuwan2, Suchanan Hanamornroongruang2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background:
This study aimed to ascertain prognostic indicators impacting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer. The secondary aim was to determine a quantifiable measure of PFS and OS for these patients.
Methods:
A comprehensive retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of vulvar cancer patients treated at Siriraj Hospital from 2006 to 2020. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, pathological features and immunohistochemical results for p16, p53 and PD-L1 were analysed for their potential as prognostic indicators for survival outcomes.
Results:
In the sample of 104 vulvar cancer patients, four factors were significantly associated with a worsening PFS. They were coexisting vulvar lesions such as lichen sclerosus and extramammary Paget's disease (p = .008); lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI; p = .011); pelvic or paraaortic lymph node metastases (p = .042); and positive p53 status (p = .046). Additionally, a tumour size exceeding 4 cm in diameter was significantly linked with decreased OS (p = .001). The median PFS and OS were calculated as 26.3 and 44.7 months, respectively. Significantly improved PFS and OS were noted in patients with a positive p16 or a negative p53 immunohistochemical profile. The calculated hazard ratios for these two subsets were 3.032 (95% CI = 1.419-6.480; p = .004) and 2.421 (95% CI = 1.120-5.232; p = .025), respectively.
Conclusions:
Factors leading to unfavourable PFS are coexisting vulvar lesions, positive LVSI status, pelvic or paraaortic lymph node metastases, and positive p53 status. Regarding OS, a tumour diameter exceeding 4 cm significantly correlates with poorer outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
09:48An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach