Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
A multimodal prehabilitation class for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a pragmatic randomised type 1 hybrid
Chelsia Gillis1, Leslee Hasil2, Ciaran Keane3
1School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Background:
Prehabilitation promotes postoperative recovery through preoperative optimisation; however, few studies have been conducted under real-world conditions. Our objective was to determine the extent to which a multimodal prehabilitation programme influenced intermediate and late recovery post-colorectal surgery in a type 1 effectiveness-implementation and randomised pragmatic trial. We hypothesised that a prehabilitation class, as part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway, would reduce length of hospital stay (LOS).
Methods:
Adult male and female patients with colorectal disease requiring an elective primary resection at a single centre were randomised to the intervention or standard care group at least 2 weeks before surgery. All participants attended an ERAS class, which was extended to include prehabilitation components of nutrition education, supplements, walking with a smartwatch, functional exercises, and deep breathing in the intervention group. Effectiveness outcomes included LOS (primary) and 6-min walking distance (6MWD; secondary outcome) at 6 weeks post-surgery. Implementation outcomes included adherence to prescribed step count and nutrient intakes. Multivariable regression analyses were adjusted for age, sex, type of surgery, and COVID-19.
Results:
The study ended prematurely. In total, 110 patients were included. Two-thirds had cancer and mean prehabilitation duration was 17.2 (sd 5.5) days. LOS was not different between groups. Preoperative median step count did not differ between groups, but protein inadequacy (prevalence ratio: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.82]) decreased substantially with prehabilitation. After surgery, the mean difference in 6MWD was +38 m (95% CI: 9-67 m) for prehabilitation vs control, indicating earlier functional recovery.
Conclusions:
A pragmatic prehabilitation programme did not influence length of hospital stay (underpowered because of early trial termination), but did reduce preoperative protein inadequacy (implementation outcome) and improve early functional recovery (secondary outcome).
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04247776).
More Related Videos
04:43Author Spotlight: Advancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Patients with Right Hemisphere Damage Using Assisted Active Exercise
Published on: February 9, 2024
05:28Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Cancer Survival Analysis