Inherent Bias in Large Language Models: A Random Sampling Analysis

Noel F Ayoub1, Karthik Balakrishnan2, Marc S Ayoub3

  • 1Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery, Mass Eye and Ear/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Insights

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) simulations revealed significant physician bias in life-or-death decisions. Large language models (LLMs) favored patients similar to the simulated physician, impacting healthcare equity.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics and Artificial Intelligence
  • Health Informatics and Bias Detection

Background:

  • Growing concerns exist regarding inherent bias, safety, and misinformation potential of large language models (LLMs).
  • These concerns have significant implications for the integration of AI in healthcare decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based simulations of physicians exhibit bias in life-and-death decisions.
  • To assess bias in resource-scarce clinical scenarios using AI simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed 13 questions simulating physicians in resource-limited environments making critical treatment choices.
  • Utilized OpenAI's GPT-4 to simulate 1000 unique physicians and patients per question, ensuring diverse demographics.
  • Patients had similar a priori survival likelihoods; physicians chose one patient to save based on limited resources.

Main Results:

  • Simulated physicians consistently demonstrated racial, gender, age, political affiliation, and sexual orientation bias.
  • Physicians predominantly favored patients sharing their own demographic characteristics (P<.05).
  • Specific biases observed included nondescript physicians favoring White, male, young patients; political affiliation influenced choices (Democrats favored Black/female; Republicans favored White/male).

Conclusions:

  • Publicly available large language models exhibit significant biases in simulated clinical decision-making.
  • These biases could negatively impact patient outcomes if AI tools are used in clinical support without safeguards.
  • Urgent need for bias mitigation strategies in AI for healthcare applications.

Related Concept Videos

Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
10.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.7K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.6K
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
3.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
785