Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System FFS for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
Design, Build, and Initial Testing of a Portable Methane Measurement Platform
Stuart N Riddick1,2, John C Riddick3, Elijah Kiplimo2
1Department of Science, Engineering and Aviation, University of the Highlands and Islands Perth, Crieff Road, Perth PH1 2NX, UK.
New, lower-cost methane sensors are being tested for accuracy and resolution. The Wireless Autonomous Transportable Methane Emission Reporting System (WATCH4ERS) evaluates four technologies for effective methane emission monitoring and climate goal achievement.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Instrumentation and Measurement
Background:
- Accurate methane concentration measurement is vital for quantifying emissions and assessing climate change mitigation strategies.
- The high cost of traditional methane analyzers limits widespread deployment for monitoring millions of emission sites.
- Development of lower-cost sensor technologies is crucial for expanding methane monitoring coverage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate the Wireless Autonomous Transportable Methane Emission Reporting System (WATCH4ERS), integrating four distinct methane sensing technologies.
- To assess the performance, accuracy, and resolution of commercially available, lower-cost methane sensors.
- To inform future large-scale methane monitoring strategies by understanding the cost-benefit balance of different sensor technologies.
Main Methods:
- Integration of four sensing technologies into the WATCH4ERS unit: Metal Oxide (MOx), Non-dispersion Infrared (NDIR), Integrated Infrared (INIR), and Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectrometer (TDLAS).
- Initial calibration procedures and controlled methane release experiments to evaluate sensor responses.
- Analysis of sensor performance, including response time, accuracy, and detection limits.
Main Results:
- The INIR sensor demonstrated limited utility for methane concentrations below 500 ppm.
- The MOx sensor exhibited a logarithmic response but showed slow response times for sub-minute concentration changes.
- The NDIR sensor provided a linear response up to 600 ppm but displayed a lag and missed rapid concentration shifts. TDLAS offered full detection but at a high cost.
Conclusions:
- Each sensor technology has potential for methane emission quantification but requires optimization through operational design or deployment strategy.
- WATCH4ERS units will be deployed in real-world settings to further investigate the practical utility of these diverse methane sensing technologies.
- Findings will contribute to understanding the cost-benefit trade-offs and inform strategies for increasing methane monitoring coverage.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Introduction and Methods of Leveling
Leveling Equipment
Differential Leveling
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

