Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

200
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
200
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon01:10

Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

67
The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon is a cognitive experience characterized by a temporary inability to retrieve specific information from memory despite having a strong feeling of knowing the information. Although individuals cannot access the target word or detail, they frequently recall related elements, such as its initial letter, syllable count, or context. This partial retrieval often causes frustration, as one might recognize a familiar face or know that a name starts with a specific...
67
Directional Terms01:14

Directional Terms

7.7K
Directional terms are essential for describing the relative locations of different body structures. For instance, an anatomist might describe one band of tissue as "inferior to" another, or a physician might describe a tumor as "superficial to" a deeper body structure. These terms often use comparative terms in pairs to trace out the relative locations of one body part to another or descriptions of body tissues like the deeper ones from superficially present with reference to...
7.7K
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

293
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
293
Language Development01:22

Language Development

284
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
284
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

4.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.

Cognitive science·2021
Same author

fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Neuropsychologia·2019
Same author

Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.

Cognition·2016
Same author

Salience and Attention in Surprisal-Based Accounts of Language Processing.

Frontiers in psychology·2016
Same author

A model of language processing as hierarchic sequential prediction.

Topics in cognitive science·2013
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K

Losing Phonotactic Distinctions in Context.

John R Starr1, Marten van Schijndel1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, Cornell University.

Cognitive Science
|April 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Context influences how we process language. This study shows phonological effects in non-words depend on phonological, syntactic, and discourse context, suggesting these effects may not generalize in larger contexts.

Keywords:
ContextDiscoursePhonotacticsSelf‐paced readingSentence processingSyntax

More Related Videos

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.3K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

379

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

9.3K
Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

2.3K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

379

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Phonology
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Sentence processing is influenced by syntactic and discourse context.
  • Systematic investigation of context's effect on low-level linguistic representations is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how phonological, syntactic, and discourse context influence phonotactic distinctions in non-words.
  • To determine if established phonological and psycholinguistic effects generalize to larger contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a series of self-paced reading experiments.
  • Manipulated phonological, syntactic, and discourse context.
  • Measured phonotactic distinctions in non-words.

Main Results:

  • Phonotactic distinctions in non-words were influenced by phonological, syntactic, and discourse context.
  • Context affected the timing and occurrence of phonotactic distinctions.
  • Established phonological and psycholinguistic effects showed context-dependent generalization.

Conclusions:

  • Context plays a crucial role in managing low-level linguistic representations.
  • Phonotactic effects are not static and vary based on surrounding linguistic information.
  • Findings challenge the universal applicability of certain psycholinguistic effects outside of controlled, smaller contexts.