Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Mapping risks of water injustice and perceptions of privatized drinking water in the United States: A mixed methods
Alex Segrè Cohen1, Catherine E Slavik1,2, Sami Kurani3
1School of Journalism and Communication and Center for Science Communication Research, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Abstract:
About 2 million people in the United States do not have access to running water or indoor plumbing in their homes. In addition, 30 million more Americans live where water systems operate unsafely. More still could have access to clean and safe drinking water but cannot afford to pay for it. Water privatization has been proposed as both a solution to and an exacerbator of these challenges, but its potential consequences have not been investigated on a national scale. Data from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Information System and the US Center for Disease Control's Environmental Justice Index were used to assess the spatial distribution of water injustice hotspots, water system violations, and water system ownership. These data were merged with a nationally representative survey of US residents that measured how people perceive their water across different water injustice indicators. Results indicated that water system violations were not randomly distributed across the United States and risks of exposure to water injustice appeared to cluster in certain locations as hotspots. Clusters of water system violations were spatially associated with private water system ownership. Hotspots of water injustice were more often surrounded by counties with low proportions of privately owned water systems than counties with high proportions. Results also suggested that individuals living in areas with higher water injustice perceived their water as lower quality and less reliable. Water system ownership moderated this relationship. Recommendations for policymakers are discussed, including how to build collaborative decision-making processes that account for both objective and subjective measures of water injustice.
More Related Videos
07:50Construction of a Low-cost Mobile Incubator for Field and Laboratory Use
Published on: March 19, 2019
12:11A Modified EPA Method 1623 that Uses Tangential Flow Hollow-fiber Ultrafiltration and Heat Dissociation Steps to Detect Waterborne Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp.
Published on: July 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
The Water Cycle
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Surveys