Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Motor or Frontal Cortex in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability
Alan R Needle1,2, Jared W Skinner1, Mabry G Watson1
1Department of Public Health & Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) combined with motor planning exercises improved chronic ankle instability (CAI) function. The motor planning intervention was effective regardless of atDCS application, suggesting electrode placement is key for optimal results.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Sports Medicine
Background:
- Chronic ankle instability (CAI) affects motor function and quality of life.
- Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) shows promise when combined with motor interventions for CAI.
- Limited research compares different atDCS application sites for CAI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of atDCS over the motor cortex versus the frontal cortex, combined with motor planning, for improving neural function, performance, and patient-reported outcomes in CAI patients.
- To assess the impact of atDCS on dynamic balance, muscle activation, reaction times, and cognitive performance in individuals with CAI.
- To evaluate patient-reported outcomes, including foot and ankle function and perceived disablement, following the intervention.
Main Methods:
- A double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel randomized trial involving 44 participants with CAI.
- Participants received a four-week motor planning intervention with atDCS applied over the motor cortex, frontal cortex, or sham.
- Outcome measures included neural excitability, dynamic balance, muscle activation, reaction times, and patient-reported outcomes assessed at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 6.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found in neural excitability or muscle activation across the groups.
- All groups showed significant improvements in dynamic postural stability from baseline.
- Improvements in foot & ankle function, perceived disablement, and overall perceived improvement were significant post-intervention and at retention.
Conclusions:
- The motor planning intervention effectively improved function in patients with CAI, irrespective of atDCS application.
- The potential benefits of atDCS may depend on the precise pairing of electrode placement with specific rehabilitation exercises.
- Further research is needed to optimize atDCS protocols for CAI rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
11:06Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
