Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.6K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.6K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

18
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
18
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

29
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
29
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

162
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
162
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

99
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
99
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

4.9K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adjusted predictions for generalized estimating equations.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Homogeneity pursuit and variable selection in regression models for multivariate abundance data.

Biometrics·2024
Same author

Assuming independence in spatial latent variable models: Consequences and implications of misspecification.

Biometrics·2020
Same author

Order selection and sparsity in latent variable models via the ordered factor LASSO.

Biometrics·2018
Same author

Declining orangutan encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant.

PloS one·2010
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K

Inferential procedures for random effects in generalized linear mixed models.

Xu Ning1, Francis K C Hui1, Alan Welsh1

  • 1Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Plos One
|April 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares three uncertainty measures for generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) predictions. Despite theoretical differences, their estimators are similar, offering insights into predictive inference and interval construction.

More Related Videos

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

396

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

396

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are widely used for complex data.
  • Accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial for reliable random effects prediction in GLMMs.
  • Existing prediction uncertainty measures in GLMMs require careful theoretical and empirical evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three common measures of uncertainty for random effects prediction in GLMMs.
  • To derive asymptotic results on the consistency of these uncertainty measures.
  • To resolve discrepancies between theoretical and empirical findings for a specific GLMM variance estimator.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of three uncertainty measures: unconditional and conditional mean squared errors of prediction (UMSEP, CMSEP), and glmmTMB prediction gap variance.
  • Derivation of asymptotic consistency results for the uncertainty estimators.
  • Re-interpretation of the glmmTMB variance estimator under conditional assumptions.

Main Results:

  • The three distinct theoretical uncertainty measures yield estimators that are remarkably similar in form.
  • Asymptotic analysis confirms the consistency of the derived uncertainty estimators.
  • A conditional re-interpretation resolves prior contradictions in the glmmTMB variance estimator's performance.

Conclusions:

  • The similarity in estimators suggests practical interchangeability for certain GLMM prediction tasks.
  • The derived asymptotic results provide theoretical grounding for uncertainty estimation in GLMMs.
  • Findings impact the construction of prediction intervals for random effects, particularly concerning normality assumptions.