Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2025

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
Published on: August 8, 2014
Neutral Boundary Layer Urban Dispersion in Scaled Uniform and Nonuniform Residential Building Arrays
Jonathan Retter1,2, David Heist2, R Chris Owen2
1ORAU ORISE Research Participation Program Hosted at EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Abstract:
Dispersion within idealized urban environments was studied in a simulated neutrally buoyant, 1:200 scale boundary layer with the Meteorological Wind Tunnel at the EPA's Fluid Modeling Facility. The measurements are used to offer a baseline of performance for the mechanical turbulence formulation and concentration predictions of AERMOD, the EPA's preferred Gaussian dispersion model. Scaled meteorological conditions and dispersion characteristics were studied for both uniform and nonuniform building arrays oriented at 0° and 30° with respect to the flow and were compared to baseline, "rural", measurements without the presence of buildings. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measured velocity and shear stress profiles within each model configuration, whereas hydrocarbon analyzers (HCAs) measured ethane concentrations at defined points throughout the model. Four source locations were examined for each building array, with two in the urban core and two in a street canyon, each with a source within and above the building canopy. Experimental profiles, regardless of their shape, were fitted to Gaussian profiles to determine lateral and vertical plume spread and shift from the wind tunnel centerline. These parameters were compared against a no-building reference case. Concentration predictions using the formulations in AERMOD are computed for 3 variations of modeled velocity profiles for each source, using factor of 2 ( ) and fractional bias ( ) as the governing model evaluation parameters. The two urban configurations were found to decrease the performance by 34.1% and 30.1% from the no-building reference for the uniform and nonuniform cases, respectively, while producing modeled concentrations of only 48.1% and 62.4% of the 10 highest observed concentrations. These results encouraged simple first-order corrections to improve model performance with an emphasis on predicting maximum concentrations for regulatory purposes. These corrections proved successful for the uniform cases, mitigating , and improving the percentage by 11.4% with more mixed results in nonuniform configurations, highlighting the difficulty in applying uniformly derived parameterizations in realistic, nonuniform environments.
Related Concept Videos
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Types of Building Separation Joints
Volume-change joints address the effects of expansion and contraction due to temperature and moisture variations. They are strategically placed at discontinuities in a building's mass where cracking is most likely and are spaced about 150 to 200...
Distribution and Dispersion
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related...
Resultant of a General Distributed Loading
Examples such as load distribution due to wind and load distribution on a bridge illustrate how this concept is used to analyze and design safe, reliable structures under variable loading conditions. Most structures, such as residential buildings, bridges, and towers, are...
Boundary Conditions: Lossless Lines
At the receiving end, the boundary condition states that the voltage equals the product of the receiving-end impedance and current. This relationship is expressed as a function of the incident and...

