Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

38.6K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.6K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

43.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
43.9K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.0K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.0K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

33.9K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
33.9K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.2K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fighting fiscal awkwardness: How relationship strength changes individuals' communication approach when resolving interpersonal debt.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Does thinking about God increase acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Reply to Kasper et al.: Identity threat is lower when supporting an opposing group member than an opposing group.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Individuals prefer to harm their own group rather than help an opposing group.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Increased generosity under COVID-19 threat.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Willpower as moral ability.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2025

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.7K

The interpersonal consequences of community gatekeeping.

Evan Weingarten1, Rachel Gershon2, Amit Bhattacharjee3

  • 1Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|April 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Individuals excluding outsiders are seen as less likable but more committed to group values. This perception intensifies when group values are sacred and candidates fit poorly, influencing voting and donations.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2025

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.7K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Human identity is strongly linked to group memberships and shared values.
  • Understanding how group boundaries are established and maintained is crucial.
  • Gatekeeping, the process of controlling group membership, significantly impacts social perceptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals evaluate gatekeeping behaviors (exclusion vs. inclusion).
  • To determine factors influencing perceptions of those who exclude or include potential members.
  • To explore the relationship between perceived candidate fit, value sacredness, and evaluations of gatekeepers.

Main Methods:

  • Six preregistered primary studies and seven supporting studies were conducted.
  • Utilized laboratory and online samples totaling 7,549 participants.
  • Employed experimental designs to assess perceptions of exclusion versus inclusion.

Main Results:

  • Exclusionary individuals are perceived as less likable but more committed to group values compared to inclusive individuals.
  • Perceived candidate fit moderates these effects; exclusion impacts liking less and commitment more when candidate values misalign.
  • Higher perceived sacredness of group values amplifies positive perceptions of exclusionary individuals, especially with misaligned candidates.

Conclusions:

  • Gatekeeping decisions are evaluated based on perceived commitment to group values, moderated by candidate fit and value sacredness.
  • Individuals holding values as sacred are more supportive of exclusionary practices and gatekeepers.
  • Findings highlight the complex interplay of individual and group dynamics in shaping social perceptions and behaviors.