Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

07:17
Author Spotlight: Exploring Abdominal VNS for Inflammatory Conditions
Published on: January 19, 2024
1.5K
The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Vidian-Branch Neurectomy in Intractable Allergic Rhinitis
Shaobing Xie1,2,3,4, Fengjun Wang1,2,3,4, Hua Zhang1,2,3,4
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Summary
Endoscopic vidian-branch neurectomy (EVBN) and endoscopic vidian neurectomy (EVN) effectively treat intractable allergic rhinitis (iAR). EVBN demonstrates a safer profile with fewer postoperative complications like eye dryness compared to EVN.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Allergy and Immunology
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Intractable allergic rhinitis (iAR) presents a significant clinical challenge, impacting patient quality of life.
- Current treatment options for iAR may be insufficient for some patients, necessitating alternative approaches.
- Vidian nerve neurectomy is a surgical option explored for managing severe allergic rhinitis symptoms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic selective vidian branch neurectomy (EVBN) for treating intractable allergic rhinitis (iAR).
- To compare the safety and effectiveness of EVBN against endoscopic vidian neurectomy (EVN) and conservative treatment.
- To assess long-term outcomes, including symptom reduction and postoperative complications, over a 2-year follow-up period.
Main Methods:
- A prospective clinical study conducted at a tertiary referral center.
- 205 patients with iAR were divided into three groups: EVBN, EVN, and a control group receiving conservative treatment.
- Efficacy was assessed using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Both EVBN and EVN groups showed significant improvements in RQLQ scores compared to baseline and the control group at all follow-up points.
- EVBN group reported significantly fewer instances of postoperative eye dryness (5.1%) compared to the EVN group (21.1%).
- Persistent eye dryness was noted in 8.5% of the EVN group patients, unresolved by the 2-year follow-up, whereas EVBN had minimal and transient side effects.
Conclusions:
- Endoscopic vidian-branch neurectomy (EVBN) and endoscopic vidian neurectomy (EVN) are effective treatments for intractable allergic rhinitis.
- EVBN is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative complications, particularly eye dryness, making it a potentially safer surgical option.
- The findings support EVBN as a favorable surgical intervention for patients with refractory iAR seeking improved quality of life with enhanced safety.

