Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Detection of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Haematological Malignancy Patients by using Lateral-flow Technology
Published on: March 22, 2012
Evaluation of the Analytical Sensitivity of a Molecular Point-of-Care Assay as Compared to 3 Lateral Flow Assays for
Alamelu Chandrasekaran1, Abdullah Kilic1,2, Rinki Kumar1
1Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Background:
An accurate and timely diagnosis of pharyngitis caused by group A streptococcus (GAS) is essential for ensuring appropriate antibiotic therapy. Early detection through point-of-care (POC) testing is valuable in initiating effective treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the analytical sensitivity of the molecular ID NOW™ Strep A 2 POC test as compared to 3 POC lateral flow assays: BD Veritor™ Plus System, Sofia® Strep A+ Fluorescent Immunoassay, and Sekisui Diagnostic OSOM® Strep A test for GAS detection.
Methods:
Two Streptococcus pyogenes bacterial American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) isolates and one clinical isolate from a throat swab sample were used to evaluate the limit of detection (LoD) of each assay. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the isolates starting from 107 colony factor units (CFU)/mL were prepared, and each dilution was tested in triplicate for all 4 assays simultaneously. All tests were performed as per manufacturers' instructions. The LoD was defined as the last dilution that yielded positive results for all 3 replicates. CFU per swab was also calculated.
Results:
For the 3 isolates evaluated, LoDs of ID NOW Strep A 2 ranged from 3.125 × 103 to 2.5 × 104 CFU/mL; for Quidel Sofia the range was 1 × 106 to 1 × 107 CFU/mL; for BD Veritor the range was 1 × 107 to 1.5 × 107 CFU/mL; and for Sekisui OSOM the LoD was 1 × 107 CFU/mL for all 3 isolates.
Conclusions:
Compared to antigen-based lateral flow assays (LFAs), the molecular ID Now Strep A 2 assay demonstrated a lower LoD, which translates into higher sensitivity. In a clinical setting, this could enable detection of samples with a lower bacterial load that could be missed by low-sensitivity LFAs.
More Related Videos
10:10Development of a Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Strip for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Small Molecule Compounds
Published on: November 13, 2021
05:25Author Spotlight: Expanding the Scope of Multiplex Immunoassays for Lyme Borreliosis Diagnostics and Pathogen Research
Published on: July 14, 2023