Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

Induction and Assessment of Levodopa-induced Dyskinesias in a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease
Published on: October 14, 2021
Evaluation of Ropinirole versus Apomorphine for Emesis Induction in Dogs
Ryan R Reeves1, Brandi L Mattison1, Deborah A Keys2
1Arizona Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Center, Gilbert, Arizona, USA.
Apomorphine (APO) is a more effective emetic agent than ropinirole (ROP) eye drops for dogs in emergency settings, offering faster results and fewer complications. APO demonstrated higher success rates and quicker onset of action compared to ROP.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Emergency Medicine
- Toxicology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Inducing emesis is crucial for gastric decontamination in dogs following toxic ingestions.
- Ropinirole (ROP) eye drops and intravenous apomorphine (APO) are potential emetic agents used in veterinary emergency medicine.
- Comparative efficacy and safety data for these agents are essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the emetic efficacy of ROP eye drops versus IV APO in dogs presenting with foreign material ingestion.
- To evaluate and compare the adverse effects associated with ROP and APO administration.
- To determine the optimal emetic agent for emergency gastric decontamination in canine patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 132 client-owned dogs with suspected foreign material ingestion.
- Dogs were randomly assigned to receive either ROP eye drops or IV APO for emesis induction.
- Efficacy outcomes included first-dose success, time to emesis, and need for rescue antiemetics; adverse events and vital signs were monitored.
Main Results:
- Apomorphine (APO) achieved a significantly higher first-dose success rate (99%) compared to ropinirole (ROP) (81%) (P < 0.001).
- The median time to first emesis was markedly shorter with APO (1.6 min) than with ROP (8.6 min) (P < 0.001).
- Rescue antiemetic therapy was required in 37% of ROP-treated dogs, versus none in the APO group (P < 0.001); minor adverse events were more frequent with ROP.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous apomorphine (APO) is a clinically superior emetic agent compared to ropinirole (ROP) eye drops for emergency gastric decontamination in dogs.
- APO demonstrates faster onset, higher efficacy, and a lower incidence of protracted vomiting requiring intervention.
- ROP eye drops were associated with lower success rates, delayed emesis, and a higher frequency of minor adverse events and protracted vomiting.
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Opioids as Antidiarrheal Agents
Opioids, widely used antidiarrheal agents, mitigate diarrhea by slowing down...

