Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025
Measurement of Liver Stiffness Using Atomic Force Microscopy Coupled with Polarization Microscopy
Published on: July 20, 2022
Performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers in biopsy-proven liver disorders
Nilay Danis1, Fulya Gunsar2, Funda Yilmaz3
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkiye.
Background And Aim:
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan® (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis.
Materials And Methods:
In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated.
Results:
A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior.
Conclusion:
Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.
