Attitudes to and Attendance at Cardiac Rehabilitation After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Barbara M Murphy1, Michelle C Rogerson, Siiri E Iismaa

  • 1Author Affiliations: Australian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Drs Murphy, Rogerson and Le Grande, and Prof Jackson); School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Drs Murphy and Le Grande, and Prof Jackson); Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Drs Iismaa and Hesselson, and Prof Graham); St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Dr Iismaa and Prof Graham); and Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong (Prof Jackson).

Insights

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) attendance is high after spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), but patients perceive traditional CR as irrelevant. Tailored SCAD-specific programs are needed to improve patient support and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Public Health
  • Patient Support

Background:

  • Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is standard post-heart event care.
  • Uptake and relevance of CR after spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate attitudes toward CR in SCAD survivors.
  • Determine CR attendance rates and correlates.
  • Identify reasons for CR non-attendance post-SCAD.

Main Methods:

  • Online focus groups (n=30) explored SCAD survivor attitudes toward CR.
  • Thematic analysis of focus group data.
  • Online survey (n=310) assessed CR attendance, correlates, and non-attendance reasons.

Main Results:

  • Qualitative themes: perceived lack of CR relevance, attendee mismatch, health professional knowledge gaps, preference for SCAD-specific CR, and perceived benefits.
  • CR attendance rate was 63% (73% among referred).
  • Mid-level education and lifetime anxiety correlated with CR attendance.

Conclusions:

  • Despite high attendance, SCAD survivors perceive traditional CR as unnecessary or irrelevant.
  • Findings highlight the need for SCAD-specific CR programs and support.
  • Addressing patient perceptions and tailoring CR is crucial for effective post-SCAD care.
Abstract