Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation:

Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi1, Kathryn Manalo, Abulikemu Abuduweili

  • 1Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Tieliwaerdi, Manalo, Khan, and Appiah-kubi); Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania(Dr Abuduweili); and Allegheny Health Network, Allegheny Health Network Cardiovascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Williams and Oehler).

Insights

Machine learning (ML) models show promise for predicting outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). However, current models lack external validation and robust methodology, questioning their readiness for clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) significantly reduces mortality and morbidity in cardiovascular disease patients.
  • Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict healthcare outcomes, including within CR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically appraise existing ML-based prognosis predictive models in CR.
  • To identify research gaps in ML applications for CR outcome prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search across major databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar) up to January 2024.
  • Extracted data on clinical features, outcomes, model development, validation, and performance metrics.
  • Assessed study quality using IJMEDI and Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Main Results:

  • 22 ML models from 7 studies were analyzed, mostly with small patient cohorts (41-227).
  • Models predicted various CR progression stages with good performance (AUC 0.82-0.91, sensitivity 0.77-0.95).
  • No models underwent calibration or external validation; most had bias concerns.

Conclusions:

  • Current ML models for CR show potential but are not ready for clinical implementation due to lack of validation and bias.
  • Further research requires external validation of existing models and development of new models using robust methods on larger datasets.
  • Future models should target diverse clinical outcomes within CR to enhance predictive capabilities.
Abstract

No abstract available in PubMed .