Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Communication

Communication

Sharing information, concepts, and emotions to foster mutual understanding is communication. The sender, recipient, and transaction must be considered in this manner. The sender is the person who shares the message, the recipient is the person who receives and understands the message, and the transaction is the method used to deliver the message and the variables that affect the communication's context and surroundings. The nurse-client connection is built on therapeutic communication.

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

Inference from social evaluation.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025

Same author

From artifacts to human lives: Investigating the domain-generality of judgments about purposes.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

Mental jenga: A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments about physical support.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2023

Same author

What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2022

Same author

Inference from explanation.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2021

Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026

Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Causation, meaning, and communication.

Ari Beller¹, Tobias Gerstenberg¹

¹Department of Psychology, Stanford University.

Psychological Review

|April 21, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study models how people choose causal language, like "caused" or "enabled," to describe events. The findings reveal a hierarchy of causal expressions and how context influences language use, impacting listener understanding.

More Related Videos

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course

Published on: July 18, 2014

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Psycholinguistics
Computational Linguistics

Background:

Language shapes our understanding of events and causality.
Previous research lacks a computational model for causal expression selection.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and test a computational model of causal expression use.
To investigate how speakers select causal language and how it affects listeners' mental representations.

Main Methods:

Developed a computational model incorporating causal representation, counterfactual simulations, and pragmatic inference.
Conducted psycholinguistic experiments to validate the model's semantics and pragmatics.
Tested the model against participant behavior in speaker and listener tasks.

Main Results:

Causal expressions form a hierarchy of specificity.
Participants make pragmatic inferences aligned with this hierarchy.
The computational model accurately predicts human behavior in causal language tasks.

Conclusions:

The model provides a novel framework for understanding the language-thought relationship in causality.
Semantics and pragmatic inference are crucial for modeling causal language use.
This work advances computational approaches to studying human cognition and language.