Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Income, education, and the clustering of risk in cardiovascular disease in the US, 1999-2018: an observational study
Salma M Abdalla1,2, Samuel B Rosenberg2, Nason Maani3
1Global Health Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
Health metrics in the United States (US) have lagged behind other high-income countries in recent decades, and show persistent gaps between socio-demographic groups. Top 20% income earners and college graduates have also increasingly diverged from the reminder of the population in various dimensions over the past few decades. This study described population patterns in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) by income and education over a twenty-year period.
Methods:
This analysis used nationally representative data from 10 cycles (1999-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants were stratified by income and education into four groups: top 20% income earners, college graduates; top 20% income earners, non-college graduates; bottom 80% income earners, college graduates; and bottom 80% income earners, non-college graduates. For income, we created a binary variable (ratio > 5 cutoff) using NHANES income-to-poverty ratio variable to create a standardized measure of income. We calculated the age-standardized prevalence and odds ratios of four conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF), angina, heart attack, and stroke, for each income-education group.
Findings:
49,704 participants reported data for both income and education. The age-standardized prevalence of CVD outcomes varied across the four groups. This was most significant when comparing the prevalence among the top 20% income, college graduate group to the bottom 80% income, non-college graduate group: CHF (0.5% vs. 3.0%), angina (1.4% vs. 2.8%), heart attack (1.7% vs. 3.9%), and stroke (1.1% vs. 3.4%). Compared to the top 20% income, college graduate group, the odds of all CVD conditions were significantly higher in the bottom 80% income groups (college graduates: odds ratios (ORs) 1.48-3.67; non-college graduates: ORs 2.36-6.52), as well as for CHF and heart attack in the top 20% income, non-college graduates (OR 3.11 [95% CI: 1.92, 5.06] and OR 1.92 [95% CI: 1.35, 2.73], respectively).
Interpretation:
Health gaps extend beyond extremes, with risk clustering favoring top 20% income earners with college degrees while most Americans are left behind. Future research should include longitudinal studies that focus on the mechanisms through which both income and education intersect to shape CVD outcomes in the US.
Funding:
The Rockefeller Foundation.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Causality in Epidemiology
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Relative Risk
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...

