Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

67
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
67
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

106
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.1K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.1K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

87
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
87
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

3.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.4K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.1K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial-temporal planning of road traffic speed management mobile resources: Enhancing road traffic safety by optimizing resource utilization.

Traffic injury prevention·2025
Same author

Analysis of profitability of Pay-As-You-Speed scheme.

Traffic injury prevention·2023
Same author

A study of the factors affecting driving risk perception using the Bivariate Ordered Probit model.

International journal of injury control and safety promotion·2022
Same author

Predicting crash frequency for multi-vehicle collision types using multivariate Poisson-lognormal spatial model: A comparative analysis.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

1.9K

Robust crash modification factor estimation with case-control method.

Khashayar Khavarian1, Sina Sahebi2

  • 1Civil Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Traffic Injury Prevention
|April 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study enhances transportation safety analysis by developing a robust method for estimating Crash Modification Factors (CMFs). The improved case-control approach provides a CMF distribution, offering more accurate insights than single values for safety actions like U-turn elimination.

Keywords:
CMF estimationCase-ControlU-turn safetyrobust estimationtraffic accidents

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

1.9K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Transportation Safety
  • Quantitative Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Transportation safety is enhanced by quantitative and qualitative accident analysis.
  • Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) are key metrics for evaluating safety improvements.
  • Existing case-control methods for CMF estimation have limitations, including reliance on single logit models and incomplete data utilization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To enhance the robustness of estimated CMFs by employing resampling techniques within the case-control framework.
  • To compare the proposed robust method with standard CMF estimation techniques.
  • To evaluate the specific impact of U-turns on road safety, considering their placement and geometric features.

Main Methods:

  • A robust case-control method was developed by resampling the control group 1000 times to create a CMF distribution.
  • Intervening factors, such as traffic volume, were analyzed using discretization and as continuous variables.
  • The impact of U-turn elimination on road safety was assessed using the developed robust CMF estimation.

Main Results:

  • The CMF distribution is skewed and wide, indicating that a single CMF value is insufficient for accurate safety analysis.
  • Stratifying algorithms based on statistical inference of robust CMFs was verified.
  • Significant differences in CMF values were observed when using different sets of intervening variables and stratification methods.

Conclusions:

  • The robust case-control method is recommended for safety analysts due to its improved accuracy and ability to provide a CMF distribution.
  • Generating a CMF distribution allows for statistical comparison against a baseline (CMF=1) to determine the effectiveness of safety interventions.
  • This approach offers a more statistically sound basis for decision-making in transportation safety.