Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
15.4K
Comparison of the Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Implant-Supported Restorations on Titanium Base Using Various
Oriol Cantó-Navés1, Jordi Martí-Vigil1, Javier de Medrano1
1Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 24, 2025
Summary
Doped graphene PMMA showed superior marginal fit for implant restorations compared to zirconia. This finding is crucial for optimizing dental implant prosthetic success.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- The fit of dental restorations to titanium base (TiBase) abutments is critical for implant and prosthetic success.
- Material choice and fabrication methods significantly influence restoration adaptation.
- CAD-CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) technology is widely used for implant-supported crowns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the internal and marginal fit of CAD-CAM milled restorations using doped graphene PMMA, single-density zirconia, and dual-density zirconia.
- To evaluate the adaptation of these materials to titanium base abutments for single implant-supported crowns.
Main Methods:
- An in vitro study utilizing a digital method based on the silicone replica technique.
- Fabrication of implant-supported single crowns from three different milled materials.
- Digital alignment of silicone replicas to titanium bases to measure interfacial space at basal, middle, and superior planes.
Main Results:
- Doped graphene PMMA exhibited the best overall adaptation (0.06 ± 0.02 mm), outperforming single-density zirconia (0.09 ± 0.03 mm) and dual-density zirconia (0.1 ± 0.03 mm).
- No significant differences in internal fit (middle and superior planes) were found among the materials (p > 0.05).
- Doped graphene PMMA showed statistically superior marginal fit compared to both zirconia types (p < 0.05), with no difference between single and dual-density zirconia.
Conclusions:
- Doped graphene PMMA offers superior marginal adaptation for implant-supported single crowns compared to zirconia.
- Material selection impacts the marginal fit of CAD-CAM restorations on TiBase abutments.
- Further research may explore long-term clinical performance and other properties of these materials.

