Comparative Study of Acid Etching and SLA Surface Modification for Titanium Implants

The dust generated during the sandblasting process of the sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) method, commonly used to treat the surface of Ti dental implants, poses significant challenges in maintaining a clean manufacturing environment and ensuring safe working conditions. Nevertheless, surface modification remains crucial for improved performance of Ti dental implants. To address this problem and propose a clean and simple surface modification process to potentially replace SLA modification, this study aimed to characterize the surfaces of commercially pure Ti (cp-Ti) samples treated by acid etching and compare them with SLA-treated samples in terms of surface roughness (R_q), wettability (assessed through contact angle measurements), mineralized matrix deposition (evaluated through simulated body fluid [SBF] soaking), cell viability, cell differentiation (assessed based on alkaline phosphatase activity), and mineralization (assessed using MTT assay). Acid-etched surfaces exhibited nano- and micro-roughness and higher hydrophilicity than SLA surfaces, which is conducive to forming a highly bioactive TiO₂ surface. Moreover, acid-etched samples exhibited earlier hydroxyapatite deposition after SBF soaking than SLA samples. Furthermore, the acid-etched surfaces were nontoxic and displayed significantly higher cell viability and differentiation after seven days than SLA surfaces. These findings suggest that acid etching is a viable alternative to the SLA method, likely offering superior surface bioactivity and biocompatibility.