Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
Lichen Planus: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of US Dermatologists' Comorbidity Screening and Management Patterns
Savanna I Vidal1, Nikita Menta1, Adam Friedman2
1Department of Dermatology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Introduction:
Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis affecting up to 0.91% of the US's population. LP is associated with various comorbid conditions, among them autoimmune conditions. LP has various treatment strategies, although none are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved; this is further complicated by the lack of any clinical or expert guidelines. This study aimed to explore dermatology practitioners' comorbidity screening patterns and treatment practices for management of LP.
Methods:
An institutional review board (IRB)-approved, anonymous survey was distributed to members of the ODAC Conference listserv, targeting dermatology practitioners. The survey collected data on demographics, comorbidity screening, and treatment strategies.
Results:
A total of 406 respondents (17.4% response rate) participated. Hepatitis C virus was the most screened for condition (91.0%), despite its overall low prevalence in patients with LP. Screening rates for highly prevalent comorbidities such as hypertension (10.1%), dyslipidemia (9.7%), depression (18.7%), and anxiety (17.3%) were low. Importantly, almost one-third (32.5%) of respondents reported performing no screening for any comorbid conditions. Topical corticosteroids were the most prescribed therapy (97.8%), followed by topical calcineurin inhibitors (67.7%) and intralesional corticosteroids (64.8%), consistent with high-level evidence for their use in LP treatment. Phototherapy and systemic treatments, including oral immunosuppressants and retinoids, were less frequently utilized despite strong evidence supporting their use.
Conclusion:
These data highlight gaps in the comorbidity screening practices among dermatology practitioners managing LP, with significant underscreening for prevalent conditions. While respondents commonly relied on some evidence-based topical treatments, there is notable underutilization of systemic treatments for moderate to severe disease. These results emphasize the need for clinical guidelines for LP management, aiming to enhance patient care and outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:37Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
Published on: August 18, 2022
02:28Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management