Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Versatility of Protocols for Resistance Training and Assessment Using Static and Dynamic Ladders in Animal Models
Published on: December 17, 2021
Effects of Different Ranges of Loads on Physical Performance Using Velocity-Based Resistance Training.
Javier Riscart-López1,2, Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas3, Fernando Colomina-Clemens3
1Department of Sports and Computer Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain.
A wider range of training loads improves overall strength gains, while a narrower range enhances sprinting performance. Coaches can tailor load ranges to optimize adaptations based on competition schedules.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
Background:
- The optimal range of relative loads (%1RM) for resistance training is not well-defined.
- Understanding load ranges is crucial for maximizing strength and performance adaptations.
- Velocity-based resistance training (VBT) offers a precise method to control and study load ranges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of different relative load ranges (50-85%, 55-75%, 60-70% 1RM) on physical performance.
- To investigate adaptations in strength, velocity, and sprint performance using VBT.
- To determine if specific load ranges yield superior outcomes for different performance metrics.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-eight men participated in an 8-week full squat (SQ) resistance training program using VBT.
- Participants were randomly assigned to three groups with distinct load ranges (R50-85, R55-75, R60-70).
- Training involved similar mean relative intensity (65% 1RM) and total volume (240 repetitions); performance was assessed via 1RM, average velocity (AV), AV > 1 m/s, AV < 1 m/s, countermovement jump (CMJ), and sprint times (T10, T20, T10-20).
Main Results:
- The R50-85 group showed significantly greater gains in average velocity (AV) compared to the R60-70 group.
- All groups improved 1RM, AV, AV > 1, AV < 1, and CMJ height significantly.
- The R60-70 group demonstrated significant improvements in sprint times (T10-20 and T20), which were not observed in the R50-85 group.
Conclusions:
- Different load ranges induce distinct strength and performance adaptations.
- Broader load ranges (e.g., R50-85) promote greater strength gains across the entire load-velocity spectrum.
- Narrower load ranges (e.g., R60-70) may be more beneficial for enhancing high-velocity actions like sprinting.
- Training load range selection should consider the time-related criteria and specific performance goals, such as proximity to competitions.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be...
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance

