Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Comparison of Smart Bands with MEMS and Motion Tracking Systems Used in Running
Andy Stamm1,2, Ronny Hartanto1, Noah Becker2
1Faculty of Technology & Bionics, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, 47533 Cleve, Germany.
Abstract:
This research utilizes a self-developed inertial sensor in conjunction with a motion tracking system and four Smart Bands to record a runner's movements and extract parameters such as step numbers, length, and frequencies at different running speeds. The data obtained were processed to find the number of steps taken. These steps were also recorded by an IMU (inertial measurement unit) and motion tracking system (MoCap-Motion Capturing) and used to compare the different systems and find their agreement at different running speeds. The results show a very strong correlation between the IMU and the motion tracking system with r2 = 0.968 at 6 km/h, r2 = 0.991 at 8 km/h, r2 = 0.991 at 10 km/h, and r2 = 0.996 at 12 km/h. The Xiaomi Mi Band 2 showed an r2 = 0.861 at 6 km/h, r2 = 0.985 at 8 km/h, r2 = 0.977 at 10 km/h, and r2 = 0.987 at 12 km/h and can therefore be considered a good replacement for an IMU.
More Related Videos
04:06Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography
Published on: January 12, 2024
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025