Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Association of non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices, mean platelet volume and prostate cancer: a
Jinru Wang1, Hengqing An2, Ning Tao3
1College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, China.
Purpose:
Insulin resistance and prostate cancer (PCa) association results remain controversial. However, few studies have compared the role of various non-insulin-based insulin resistance (NI-IR) indices and mean platelet volume (MPV) in PCa.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study, the case group included 354 patients with PCa, and the control group included 1,498 non-PCa participants. We performed inverse probability weighting to reduce the impact of differences in baseline information between the case and control groups on results. Weighted logistic regression analysis for assessing the relationship between NI-IR indices and PCa risk. Fitting 4-point restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots to show the trend of NI-IR indices with PCa risk. The interaction between insulin resistance and platelet volume based on generalized additive model (GAM) to reveal the impact of the interaction between insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk on PCa. In the end, we performed three sensitivity analyses to verify the stability of results.
Results:
Weighted logistic regression analysis revealed that all NI-IR indices were associated with PCa. When NI-IR indices were evaluated as continuous variables, in the all variables adjusted model (model 3), the adjusted OR of ZJU index was 1.337 (95%CI: 1.296-1.379), the adjusted OR of TyG index was 5.300 (95%CI:4.208-6.675), the adjusted OR of TG/HDL-c was 1.431 (95%CI:1.335-1.534), and the adjusted OR of METS-IR was 1.129 (95%CI:1.110-1.149). When NI-IR indices were analyzed as categorical variables, also in model 3, using Q1 as reference, the adjusted OR of ZJU index in Q5 was 15.592 (95%CI:10.809-22.492), the adjusted OR of TyG index in Q5 was 7.306 (95%CI:5.182-10.301), the adjusted OR of TG/HDL-c in Q5 was 4.790 (95%CI:3.459-6.632), and the adjusted OR of METS-IR in Q5 was 9.844 (95%CI:6.862-14.121). RCS displayed that PCa risk tended to increase as the ZJU index, TyG index, TG/HDL-c, and METS-IR increased. The interaction test based on the GAM indicated that the value of the interaction between TG/HDL-c and MPV on the PCa risk was χ2 = 6.924(P = 0.009). With the increase in TG/HDL-c and the decrease in MPV, the PCa risk progressively increases. The sensitivity analysis further confirmed the robustness of the results.
Conclusions:
NI-IR indices were associated with an increased PCa risk. The interaction between MPV and insulin resistance may further contribute to the PCa risk.
More Related Videos
13:19Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
11:56In vitro Method to Observe E-selectin-mediated Interactions Between Prostate Circulating Tumor Cells Derived From Patients and Human Endothelial Cells
Published on: May 15, 2014