High-Dose Steroids, Treatment Escalation, and Healthcare Burden in Myasthenia Gravis: A US Claims-Based Cohort Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Mar Pujades-Rodríguez1, Adam Jedrzejczyk2, Jiachen Zhou3
1UCB, Brussels, Belgium. mar.pujades@ucb.com.
Introduction:
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular autoimmune disease, characterized by chronic, fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Despite established therapies, many patients have inadequately controlled MG. We describe treatment escalation patterns and outcomes for patients with MG between 2010 and 2018.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of medical and pharmacy claims data. Patients aged ≥ 18 years at MG diagnosis were included from two US Merative™ MarketScan® databases. MG treatment escalation was defined as an increase of the administered prednisolone-equivalent corticosteroid dose, use of add-on treatments, or treatment switches.
Results:
The cohort included 4925 adults with newly diagnosed MG (1102 aged 18-49 and 3823 aged ≥ 50 at first MG diagnosis) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. Median follow-up was 30.0 months (18-49 group) and 27.5 months (≥ 50 group). Overall, 71.5% (3521/4925) of patients had ≥ 1 MG treatment escalation; escalation with high-dose corticosteroids was the most common type (64.8% [18-49 group] and 58.5% [≥ 50 group]). In the first year post-diagnosis, median (range) maximal daily prednisolone-equivalent corticosteroid dose was 40.0 (20.0-75.0) mg/day (18-49 group) and 40.0 (20.0-70.0) mg/day (≥ 50 group). Treatment breaks and de-escalation led to rescue treatment or treatment re-escalation in most patients. Exacerbations occurred in 26.3% (n = 290; 18-49 group) and 21.6% (n = 825; ≥ 50 group). Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs were highest in Year 1, with mean MG-related costs per patient between $24,982 (≥ 50 group) and $33,023 (18-49 group).
Conclusion:
The study findings highlight that MG is inadequately controlled in a substantial proportion of patients despite conventional treatment and high reliance on corticosteroids. Earlier treatment with targeted therapies and improved safety profiles may reduce patient burden, HCRU, and costs.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
05:18Author Spotlight: Ultrasound-Guided Needle Release Combined with Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Supinator Syndrome
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which leads...
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myasthenia Gravis ll: Pathophysiology