Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perceptual learning in frequency discrimination.

L Demany

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Training improved frequency discrimination at 200 Hz, especially when the training frequency was below 5000 Hz. This suggests different processes mediate frequency discrimination at low and high frequencies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Temporal pitch perception and the binaural system.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
    Same author

    Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    Same author

    Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    Same author

    Temporal dynamics of pitch strength in regular interval noises.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    Same author

    Discrimination of amplitude-modulation phase spectrum.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
    Same author

    Pitch perception: a difference between right- and left-handed listeners.

    Neuropsychologia·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory perception
    • Psychoacoustics
    • Human listener studies

    Background:

    • Frequency discrimination is crucial for pitch perception.
    • The underlying neural mechanisms for frequency discrimination may differ across frequency ranges.
    • Previous research suggests a potential distinction in auditory processing above and below 5000 Hz.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of targeted auditory training on frequency discrimination ability.
    • To determine if training at different frequency regions affects discrimination performance at a specific low frequency (200 Hz).
    • To explore the relationship between training frequency and the effectiveness of frequency discrimination improvement.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants were divided into four groups, each receiving training in a distinct frequency region (200 Hz, 360 Hz, 2500 Hz, or 6000 Hz).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Frequency discrimination at 200 Hz was assessed before and after the training period for all groups.
  • Performance metrics were analyzed to compare the effects of training across the different frequency regions.

    • Main Results:

    • Training at 200 Hz, 360 Hz, and 2500 Hz resulted in significant and comparable improvements in frequency discrimination at 200 Hz.
    • Training at 6000 Hz led to a lesser degree of improvement in frequency discrimination at 200 Hz compared to the lower frequency training groups.
    • A notable difference in training efficacy was observed between training frequencies below and above 5000 Hz.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory training is effective in enhancing frequency discrimination ability.
    • The effectiveness of auditory training for low-frequency discrimination (200 Hz) is dependent on the training frequency region.
    • Results support the hypothesis that distinct neural processes mediate frequency discrimination at low (<5000 Hz) and high (>5000 Hz) frequencies.