Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025
Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
The effect of prehospital blood products on unexpected survival: A multi-institution study
Thomas W Clements1, Jan-Michael Van Gent, Andrea Krzyzaniak
1From the Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (T.W.C., J.-M.V.G., B.A.C.), Red Duke Trauma Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and The Mcgovern School of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care (A.K., B.C., A.C., M.M., M.S., K.A.P.), Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California.
Background:
Survival prediction models use arrival vital signs, rather than prehospital (PH) vital signs to estimate expected survival of injured patients. Prehospital blood product transfusion (PHBPT) has been associated with improvement in shock index (SI) during transport. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of PHBPT on expected and observed survival.
Methods:
Retrospective review of patients from two level 1 trauma centers between July 2017 and July 2021 was performed. Center A provided PHBPT, whereas Center B began transfusion upon arrival to the trauma bay. Patients were stratified by timing of blood resuscitation (PHBPT vs. no PHBPT). Primary outcome of interest was expected survival based on Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with unexpected survival.
Results:
Of 1,139 patients included from the two centers (981 PHBPT, 158 no PHBPT), patients receiving PHBPT were more severely injured (ISS 27 vs. 19) and demonstrated higher scene SI (1.12 vs. 1.00); p < 0.05. On arrival, patients receiving PHBPT demonstrated greater improvements in SI (0.1 vs. 0.007, p = 0.017). Those receiving PHBPT had significantly more unexpected survivors calculated using PH (13% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), and arrival TRISS (15% vs. 7%, p < 0.004) compared with those receiving no PHBPT. On multivariate regression, the use of PHBPT was associated with increased odds of unexpected survival with both PH and arrival TRISS scores (Table).
Conclusion:
In this multi-institution study, the use of PHBPT was associated with improved shock index at emergency department presentation and an increase in unexpected survivors. The use of emergency department vital signs in mortality prediction models may not capture the benefits of PH blood resuscitation.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Related Concept Videos
02:45Blood Transfusion and Agglutination
History
The history of blood transfusion dates back to the 17th century, when early attempts were made in animals. In 1818 James Blundell, a British doctor, performed the first successful human blood transfusion. Later in 1900, Karl...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups