Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies
Allyson Leigh Junker1, Jan-Max Arana Juve1, Lu Bai1
1Centre for Water Technology (WATEC) & Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 3, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Standardized methods are needed to evaluate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) destruction technologies. This perspective offers best practices and criteria for robust lab protocols and performance reporting to advance PFAS treatment solutions.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Chemical Engineering
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Growing concern over per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination necessitates effective zero-pollution treatment solutions.
- Current methods for assessing PFAS destruction technologies lack standardization, hindering innovation comparison and potential evaluation.
- Challenges exist in lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction, particularly with chemical methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and address hurdles in lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies.
- To provide recommendations and best practices for developing robust laboratory protocols for PFAS treatment studies.
- To propose five criteria for standardizing the reporting of performance and advancements in PFAS degrading technologies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing challenges in lab-scale PFAS destruction technology development.
- Development of best practices for PFAS laboratory protocols, including experimental design, sample handling, and waste management.
- Proposal of five standardized criteria for reporting technology performance: scope, defluorination efficiency, energy consumption, material stability, and unit process considerations.
Main Results:
- Identification of critical aspects for robust PFAS laboratory protocols.
- Establishment of a framework with five criteria to standardize the reporting of PFAS treatment technology performance.
- Recommendations for overcoming common hurdles in the development of chemical PFAS destruction methods.
Conclusions:
- Standardized protocols and reporting criteria are essential for advancing the development of effective aqueous PFAS destruction technologies.
- Implementing best practices in lab-scale research will improve reproducibility and comparability of PFAS treatment innovations.
- The proposed criteria aim to foster systematic progress and facilitate the assessment of emerging PFAS remediation solutions.
More Related Videos
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019
07:06Investigating Long-Distance Transport of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wheat via a Split-Root Exposure Technique
Published on: September 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Bioreactor Design and Operational System
Methods of Medium Optimization