Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

Mutations

Mutations

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Melatonin supplementation for quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC geriatrics·2025

Same author

Pilot study MOVENDOP protocol - impact on quality of life following postoperative osteopathic abdominal mobilizations in patients operated for endometriosis.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Oncogenetic pedigrees: Relation between design and ability to predict mutation.

Bio Systems·2023

Same author

Benefits of using corneal topography to choose subjective refraction technique in keratoconus (RE-CON): a prospective comparative crossover clinical study.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2021

Same author

Multicenter randomized phase II study comparing docetaxel plus curcumin versus docetaxel plus placebo in first-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Cancer medicine·2021

Same author

Continuous Wound Infiltration With Ropivacaine After Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of surgical research·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

Statistical algorithms for the analysis of deleterious genetic mutations.

Laurent Serlet¹, Andrzej Stos¹, Fabrice Kwiatkowski¹

¹Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Laboratoire de Mathématiques Blaise Pascal (UMR6620), F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

|May 2, 2025

Summary

This study introduces new algorithms for identifying genetic causes of disease, like single gene or double gene mutations, using family health data without genetic information. The methods effectively distinguish between different genetic models and analyze real cancer data.

Keywords:

Cancer Data simulation Deleterious mutations Heredity Model selection Neural networks Parametric estimation

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms

Published on: December 9, 2015

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

Area of Science:

Genetics and Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Statistical Genetics

Background:

Understanding the genetic basis of diseases is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.
Distinguishing between different genetic models (e.g., single gene, multiple gene interactions) is a key challenge in genetic epidemiology.
Phenotypic data from family pedigrees is often available, but genotypic data may be limited.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate algorithms for model selection and parameter estimation of genetic mutation models.
To compare the performance of classical statistical methods with a neural network approach for genetic analysis.
To apply these algorithms to both simulated and real-world datasets, such as breast/ovarian cancer data.

Main Methods:

Development of algorithms for simultaneous estimation of unknown parameters in genetic models.
Comparison of classical statistical fitting methods with a neural network-based approach.
Validation using simulated datasets with varying genetic architectures and real family pedigree data.

Main Results:

The proposed algorithms demonstrate effective performance in distinguishing between different genetic models (single gene, double cross-effect, no genetic cause).
The neural network approach shows promise in parameter estimation and model selection compared to classical methods.
Successful application to real breast/ovarian cancer family data, highlighting the practical utility of the developed methods.

Conclusions:

The presented algorithms provide a robust framework for analyzing genetic mutations using phenotypic data.
The study highlights the potential of machine learning, specifically neural networks, in complex genetic analyses.
These methods can aid in understanding the genetic etiology of diseases like hereditary cancers.