Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

1.3K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.3K
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

94
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
94
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

2.1K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
2.1K
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

21
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
21
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

148
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
148
Operant Conditioning01:21

Operant Conditioning

1.5K
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two pathways to resolve relational inconsistencies.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Homeostasis of a representational map in the neocortex.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

Stability and robustness of idiosyncratic choice bias.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Spatiotemporal dynamics of locomotor decisions in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Sex-specific declines in cholinergic-targeting tRNA fragments in the nucleus accumbens in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2023
Same journal

Demonstration of a quantum C-NOT gate in a time-multiplexed fully reconfigurable photonic processor.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Nonlinear quantum light source with van der Waals ferroelectric NbOX<sub>2</sub> (X = Br, I).

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Antagonistic histone H2A variants and autonomous heterochromatin formation shape epigenomic patterns in Arabidopsis.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

The long tail of nitrate pollution in groundwater challenges governance of global water quality.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Select microbial metabolites promote tau aggregation in a murine tauopathy model.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Warming climate has lengthened global intense tropical cyclone seasons.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.9K

Behavior engineering using quantitative reinforcement learning models.

Ohad Dan1, Ori Plonsky2, Yonatan Loewenstein3,4,5,6

  • 1Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. ohad.dan@yale.edu.

Nature Communications
|May 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choice engineering, using quantitative models, proved more effective than qualitative principles for shaping behavior. This approach offers a novel way to compare cognitive science models.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

2.3K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.9K
Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
05:21

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling

Published on: February 16, 2024

2.3K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Engineering Psychology

Background:

  • Shaping human and animal behavior is crucial for practical and theoretical applications.
  • Traditional methods rely on qualitative psychological principles.
  • Quantitative models offer a potential for more effective behavior shaping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if quantitative choice models can engineer behavior more effectively than qualitative principles.
  • To introduce and validate the concept of 'choice engineering'.
  • To demonstrate choice engineering as a method for cognitive model comparison.

Main Methods:

  • An academic competition was organized where teams designed reward schedules.
  • Competitors used either quantitative models or qualitative principles to influence choices.
  • Participants engaged in a repeated, two-alternative choice task.

Main Results:

  • The choice engineering approach, utilizing quantitative models, was the most successful in shaping participant behavior.
  • This study provides proof of concept for using quantitative models to engineer behavior.
  • Choice engineering effectively facilitated model comparison in cognitive science.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative models provide a powerful framework for 'choice engineering' and behavior modification.
  • Choice engineering offers a practical and effective alternative to traditional methods for influencing behavior.
  • This approach serves as a novel method for comparing and advancing cognitive science models.