Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Preparation of 3D Decellularized Matrices from Fetal Mouse Skeletal Muscle for Cell Culture
Published on: March 3, 2023
Glycations on Decellularized Muscle Matrix Reduce Muscle Regeneration and Increase Inflammation
Lucas C Olson1,2, Ammar Y Jawad1, Eirian S Crocker3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
None:
Volumetric muscle loss (VML) due to traumatic injury results in the abrupt loss of contractile units, stem cells, and connective tissue, leading to long-term muscle dysfunction and reduced regenerative potential. Muscle connective tissue contains a proregenerative extracellular matrix (ECM), and our lab harnesses the regenerative capacity of decellularized muscle matrix (DMM) to treat VML, a condition with limited treatment options. However, a major limitation is that muscle often comes from aged donors. Previous work from our lab showed that aged donor muscle contains higher levels of advanced glycation end-product (AGE) cross-links compared to muscle from younger donors. This study aimed to determine whether increased AGE cross-links reduce the regenerative capacity of DMM. To test this, we first generated AGEs in DMM with direct D-ribose incubation. We then removed ∼35% of the gastrocnemius muscle in a model and treated it with either AGE-DMM or standard DMM (no AGEs), comparing results to controls. Although muscle force results remained unchanged between AGE-DMM and DMM, AGEs led to reduced muscle mass in histological sections, fewer fibers, and smaller fiber diameters. AGEs also increased collagen levels in histology, but protein assays showed reduced collagen production. We investigated the canonical receptor for AGEs, the receptor for AGEs (RAGE), and found elevated levels in AGE-treated VML compared to DMM alone, along with increased levels of the noncanonical receptor galectin-3. Both RAGE and galectin-3 are associated with inflammation, and proteomics revealed higher inflammatory markers in AGE-treated muscle than in DMM alone. In conclusion, our data suggest that AGEs impair the regenerative potential of DMM, highlighting the importance of considering donor age when sourcing muscle for DMM therapies.

