Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Severe Burn Injury in a Swine Model for Clinical Dressing Assessment
Published on: November 6, 2018
How to Assess Scar Quality in Pediatric Burn Patients: A Systematic Review on the Type and Content of Outcome
Frederique M Kemme1,2,3, Adinda Mieras1,2,3, Johannes C F Ket4
1Alliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Insights
Assessing scar quality in pediatric burn patients is crucial. While clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs) are common, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are gaining traction, yet many tools need better validation for this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Burn Scar Assessment
- Outcome Measurement in Rehabilitation
- Dermatology and Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Scar quality assessment is vital for monitoring pediatric burn patients' progress and treatment efficacy.
- Children are susceptible to long-term scarring, necessitating specialized evaluation methods.
- Existing scar assessment tools may not be fully optimized for pediatric burn populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive overview of outcome measurement instruments for scar quality in pediatric burn patients.
- To identify the most frequently used assessment tools and scar characteristics.
- To evaluate the trend and suitability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in this demographic.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to March 25, 2024.
- Inclusion of original research studies in English focusing on scar quality in pediatric burn patients.
- Categorization of identified instruments into clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs), measurement devices, and PROMs.
Main Results:
- 328 studies yielded 585 outcome measurement instruments.
- Clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs) comprised 53%, devices 25%, and PROMs 22%.
- The (modified) Vancouver Scar Scale (m)(VSS), ultrasound, and POSAS Patient scale were most frequent; thickness and itch were key characteristics. PROM use increased post-2016.
Conclusions:
- Clinician-reported outcome measures remain dominant, but patient-reported outcome measures show increasing use and importance.
- Many instruments, including PROMs, lack specific design or validation for pediatric burn patients.
- Further development and validation of scar assessment tools are needed to meet the unique requirements of pediatric burn survivors.
Abstract:
Measuring scar quality is important for monitoring scar development and evaluating treatment outcomes. Given the substantial representation of children within the burn population and their susceptibility to lifelong scarring, evaluating scar quality is particularly important in this group. This study provides an overview of outcome measurement instruments used to assess scar quality in pediatric burn patients. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science covering studies published up to March 25, 2024. We included original research studies in English that measured at least one scar quality characteristic in pediatric burn patients. We included 328 studies and identified 585 outcome measurement instruments: clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs) (53%), measurement devices (25%), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (22%). The most frequently used instruments were the (modified) Vancouver Scar Scale, ultrasound, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Patient scale, respectively. Thickness and itch were the most frequently assessed scar characteristics. The use of PROMs has increased over the past decade, particularly after 2016, highlighting their growing attention. Among the studies using PROMs, 42% reported age-related conditions, with thresholds for independent completion ranging from 5 to 16 years. However, CROMs are the most frequently used instruments. While PROMs, CROMs and measurement devices are valuable, they are often not specifically designed for or validated in pediatric burn patients, and therefore they could benefit from further development or validation to better address the specific needs of pediatric burn patients.
Related Concept Videos
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Nursing Evaluation
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...

