Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
Published on: July 4, 2007
Modelling the interplay between responsive individual vaccination decisions and the spread of SARS-CoV-2
Karina Wallrafen-Sam1, Maria Garcia Quesada2, Benjamin A Lopman2
1Life & Medical Sciences Institute (LIMES) and Bonn Center for Mathematical Life Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Background:
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy proved to be a major barrier to higher uptake, but it is unclear whether interventions targeting hesitancy could result in substantial prevention benefits. Epidemic models that represent vaccine decision-making psychology can provide insight into the potential impact of vaccine promotion interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and future epidemics of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Methods:
We coupled a network- and agent-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission with a social-psychological vaccination decision-making model in which vaccine side effects and breakthrough infections could "nudge" individuals towards vaccine resistance while spikes in COVID-19 hospitalizations could nudge them towards vaccine willingness. This model was parameterized and calibrated to represent the COVID-19 epidemic in Georgia, USA from January 2021 to August 2022. We modelled counterfactual scenarios in which increases to resistant-to-willing nudges were combined with decreases to willing-to-resistant nudges. We compared cumulative vaccine doses administered, SARS-CoV-2 incidence, and COVID-related deaths across scenarios.
Results:
Increasing the probability of hospitalization-prompted resistant-to-willing nudges increased vaccine uptake by as much as 5.4 % and decreased SARS-CoV-2 incidence by as much as 4.0 %. In contrast, decreasing the probability of breakthrough infection-related willing-to-resistant nudges had a negligible impact on further vaccination and disease outcomes.
Conclusions:
Vaccine promotion interventions that address community-level factors influencing decision-making may have a greater ability to avert SARS-CoV-2 infections than those targeted to individual vaccination and infection history. Additionally, reactive vaccine promotion interventions may have only limited prevention benefits in the short term, suggesting that attention should be paid to formulating interventions that accurately anticipate the case curve.
More Related Videos
12:21A Mouse Model for the Transition of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Colonizer to Pathogen upon Viral Co-Infection Recapitulates Age-Exacerbated Illness
Published on: September 28, 2022
10:11Modeling The Lifecycle Of Ebola Virus Under Biosafety Level 2 Conditions With Virus-like Particles Containing Tetracistronic Minigenomes
Published on: September 27, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Causality in Epidemiology
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...