Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Problem-Solving01:29

Problem-Solving

74
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
74
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

63
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
63
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

91
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
91
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

45
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
45
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

62
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
62
Modeling in Therapy01:26

Modeling in Therapy

26
Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
26

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of the Epi2SensA Method Using the EpiDerm™ Model for Skin Sensitization Testing Under OECD TG442D.

Toxics·2026
Same author

Reevaluating new and existing challenges Early Career Researchers face across Regulatory Ecotoxicology.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same author

Exploring experiences of the regulatory toxicology system: system-level promoters and inhibitors of new approach methodologies.

Archives of toxicology·2025
Same author

ExtractPDF: A data extraction tool for scientific papers applied to a systematic scoping review in public health.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2025
Same author

Assessing the reporting quality of published qualitative evidence syntheses in the cochrane library.

Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods..·2025
Same author

A comprehensive item bank of internal validity issues of relevance to in vitro toxicology studies.

Evidence-based toxicology·2025
Same journal

Copper oxide nanoparticles: from EU-regulatory landscape and mechanistic toxicity towards a cuproptosis-linked adverse outcome pathway.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Causality analysis of toxicological mechanisms in networked systems such as adverse outcome pathway networks.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Thyroxin displacement from single and combined thyroid hormone binding proteins by various test substances.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Species, cell proliferation state and oxygen partial pressure are major factors in the in vitro toxicity of repurposed potential ADPKD drugs in human and murine renal proximal tubule cells.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

PBK modelling of phthalates and their metabolites and the application in next generation risk assessment.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Correction: The potent human CAR activator CITCO is a non-genotoxic hepatic tumour-promoting agent in humanised constitutive androstane receptor mice but not in wild-type animals.

Archives of toxicology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.7K

Improving how we use workshops when solving complex research problems: reflections from the CHANGE project.

Lowenna B Jones1,2, Paul Whaley3,4, Angela Bearth5,6

  • 1Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. lbjones3@sheffield.ac.uk.

Archives of Toxicology
|May 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Organizing successful research workshops requires careful planning for stakeholder engagement and inclusive participation. This article offers practical recommendations for researchers navigating complex projects and diverse viewpoints.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.8K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.7K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.8K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Research Management
  • Interdisciplinary Studies

Background:

  • Organizing workshops for complex research problems presents challenges due to diverse stakeholders and potential conflicts.
  • The CHANGE project, a 3-year initiative, focuses on cross-sector consensus building for a complex topic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and reflect on the organizational approach for the CHANGE workshop.
  • To provide recommendations for effective workshop design and stakeholder engagement in research.

Main Methods:

  • Reflection on fundamental aspects of stakeholder engagement.
  • Analysis of workshop design, methodological approach, and inclusive participation strategies.
  • Case study of the CHANGE workshop held in Oslo, June 2024.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key challenges in managing diverse stakeholder interests and viewpoints.
  • Development of strategies for inclusive participation and effective workshop design.
  • Insights into cross-sector consensus-building processes.

Conclusions:

  • Effective workshop organization hinges on strategic stakeholder engagement and inclusive design.
  • Recommendations are provided for researchers seeking to enhance workshop effectiveness in complex research settings.
  • The CHANGE workshop experience offers valuable lessons for the broader research community.