Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

199
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
199
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

89.6K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
89.6K
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon01:10

Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon

61
The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) phenomenon is a cognitive experience characterized by a temporary inability to retrieve specific information from memory despite having a strong feeling of knowing the information. Although individuals cannot access the target word or detail, they frequently recall related elements, such as its initial letter, syllable count, or context. This partial retrieval often causes frustration, as one might recognize a familiar face or know that a name starts with a specific...
61

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MATCH: A toolbox to assess the primary color of real-world objects and generate color-matching stimuli.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

How robust is categorial distractor suppression? Assessing the impact of additional categories and increased set size.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Explicit and implicit category learning in categorical visual search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

The depth of executive function: Depth information aids executive function under challenging task conditions.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2022
Same author

Is the key to phishing training persistence?: Developing a novel persistent intervention.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2022
Same author

Training detection of camouflaged targets in natural scenes: Backgrounds and targets both matter.

Acta psychologica·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K

Top-down categorical information can be utilized in distractor suppression.

Jessica N Goetz1, Mark B Neider2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg 99, Ste. 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-1390, USA. jessica.goetz@ucf.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that people can suppress distracting information when it is presented categorically. This finding suggests attention guidance uses distractor information, not just target features.

Keywords:
AttentionCategorical cueingDistractor suppression

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

8.8K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Top-down information improves attention by suppressing distractors.
  • Distractor suppression is considered separate from target guidance.
  • Previous research focused on salient cues, leaving categorical cues unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if distractor suppression extends to categorical cues.
  • To determine if categorical information can be actively suppressed by the attentional system.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using modified attentional paradigms.
  • Experiment 1 replicated suppression with categorical objects.
  • Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated stimulus salience and target sets to isolate categorical effects.

Main Results:

  • Distractor suppression effects were replicated with categorical cues.
  • Faster response times (RTs) were observed when the cued distractor category was present.
  • Suppression effects persisted even with modified target sets.

Conclusions:

  • Categorical information can be effectively suppressed in attentional tasks.
  • Attentional guidance is influenced by knowledge of distractor categories, not solely target features.
  • This challenges the view that attention relies exclusively on target feature weighting.