Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.4K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

5.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
5.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

163
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
163
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

19
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
19
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

10.7K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
10.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

The Indian journal of medical research·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Associated Social Factors of Prediabetes in Children and Adolescents in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Indian pediatrics·2026
Same author

KDIGO Life Cycle of Guideline Development Series Part 5: Guideline updates and a living model for the future.

Kidney international·2026
Same author

KDIGO Life Cycle of Guideline Development Series Part 6: Bridging the Gap between Guidelines and Clinical Practice: The KDIGO Approach to Global Implementation and Education in Nephrology.

Kidney international·2026
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary with Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India·2026
Same author

Virtual Reality to Improve Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

400

Unit of analysis error in a meta-analysis.

Arushi Yadav1, Jitendra Meena2, Jogender Kumar3

  • 1Consultant Radiologist, Spiral Diagnostic Center, Chandigarh, India.

European Journal of Pediatrics
|May 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Concerns regarding methodological flaws in a network meta-analysis by Wang et al. are raised. Sound methodology is crucial for network meta-analysis, as it influences clinical guidelines and decisions.

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

69.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

400
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

69.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Network meta-analysis is frequently used to inform clinical guidelines and decision-making.
  • Methodological rigor is essential for the validity and reliability of meta-analysis findings.
  • Concerns have been identified in a recent network meta-analysis by Wang et al.

Discussion:

  • This correspondence highlights potential methodological issues in the Wang et al. network meta-analysis.
  • Critiques focus on aspects that could impact the accuracy of the pooled results.
  • The importance of robust methodology in meta-analysis is re-emphasized.

Key Insights:

  • Methodological soundness is paramount for meta-analyses influencing clinical practice.
  • Flaws in meta-analysis methodology can lead to incorrect conclusions.
  • Critical appraisal of network meta-analyses is vital for maintaining scientific integrity.

Outlook:

  • Further scrutiny of meta-analysis methodologies is warranted.
  • Promoting best practices in meta-analysis will enhance the reliability of evidence synthesis.
  • Ensuring methodological accuracy is key to advancing evidence-based healthcare.