Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

11.8K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
11.8K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

4.8K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
4.8K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental health service utilization among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and serious mental illness before and during the emergence of telehealth services.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Mitra on Disability data: a case study in research limitation transparency.

Health affairs scholar·2025
Same author

The moderating effects of perceived transportation access on health and social connectedness for people with disabilities.

Journal of transport & health·2025
Same author

Exploring the relationship between COVID-19 risk and employment quality among a sample of individuals with disabilities.

Journal of vocational rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Does who responds matter?: exploring potential proxy response bias in the Washington Group Short Set disability estimates.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics·2025
Same author

Disability data: a case study in research limitation transparency.

Health affairs scholar·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2025

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.2K

Accessible, not Exploitable: Navigating fraud prevention in disability research.

Kelsey S Goddard1, Jean P Hall1, Noelle K Kurth1

  • 1University of Kansas, Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies (KU-IHDPS), 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Room 1052, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.

Disability and Health Journal
|May 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Survey fraud threatens disability research integrity. New adaptive tools and inclusive incentives are proposed to balance data accuracy with participant access, ensuring reliable policy insights.

Keywords:
AccessibilityData integrityDisability researchInclusivitySurvey fraud

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2025

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.2K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.5K
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Public Health
  • Disability Studies

Background:

  • Disability research is crucial for policy and services.
  • Survey fraud, often bot-driven, compromises research integrity, especially in small sample studies.
  • Traditional fraud detection methods can exclude legitimate participants, particularly those using assistive technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the recruitment paradox in disability research: balancing inclusivity with fraud prevention.
  • To propose strategies for enhancing data integrity while ensuring equitable participation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current fraud detection limitations in disability research.
  • Analysis of the recruitment paradox and its impact on data quality.
  • Proposal of adaptive fraud detection, participatory design, and equitable incentives.

Main Results:

  • Traditional fraud detection methods are insufficient and can be exclusionary.
  • Inclusive participation incentives may inadvertently attract fraudulent responses.
  • A balance is needed between data integrity and accessibility for genuine participants.

Conclusions:

  • Adaptive fraud detection tools are essential for robust disability research.
  • Participatory design and equitable incentives can mitigate fraud while promoting inclusivity.
  • These strategies support the development of effective and equitable policies for people with disabilities.