Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

193
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
193
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

330
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
330
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

433
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
433
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

374
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
374
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

313
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
313
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

310
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
310

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From dots to faces: individual differences in visual imagery capacity predict the content of Ganzflicker-induced hallucinations.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

The influence of co-speech gestures on speech envelope tracking.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

Words and Worlds Both: Dynamic Effects of Distributional and Sensorimotor Information in Semantic Processing.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

The Facilitatory Role of Rhyme During Word Learning: Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Evidence.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

Point-light Talkers: Multisensory Enhancement of Speech Tracking by Co-speech Movement Kinematics.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Strong Prediction: Language Model Surprisal Explains Multiple N400 Effects.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Published on: February 21, 2011

Decoding Prosodic Information from Motion Capture Data: The Gravity of Co-Speech Gestures.

Jacob P Momsen1,2, Seana Coulson1,3

  • 1Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communication Disorders, San Diego State University and UC San Diego.

Open Mind : Discoveries in Cognitive Science
|May 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding how body movements sync with speech is key. This study shows that analyzing movement

Keywords:
gesturekineticsmachine learningprosodyspeech

More Related Videos

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Published on: February 21, 2011

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Multimodal Communication
  • Biomechanics of Speech
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Visual cues from body movements, particularly co-speech gestures, influence speech perception.
  • The specific kinematic features of gestures relevant for speech integration remain largely unknown.
  • Quantifying the relationship between movement kinematics and vocal acoustics is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate which kinematic features of co-speech gestures are relevant for integration with speech.
  • To quantify co-speech gestures using machine learning to model vocal acoustics.
  • To determine if kinetic descriptions of human movement can model their temporal relationship with speech.

Main Methods:

  • Employed machine learning techniques to quantify co-speech gestures.
  • Conducted two experiments manipulating the relationship between movement kinematics and gravitational acceleration.
  • Analyzed the anisotropic relation of co-speech movement to downward gravitational forces.

Main Results:

  • Quantifying co-speech movement relative to gravitational forces significantly improved prediction of speech prosody.
  • The low-pass envelope of speech acoustics was effectively predicted using movement kinematics.
  • Highlighting or obscuring the link between movement and gravity impacted predictive accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Movement kinematics, specifically their anisotropic relation to gravity, are relevant for speech-gesture synchrony.
  • Biomechanics offers a framework for understanding the integration of audiovisual speech signals.
  • Findings motivate further research in audiovisual integration and biological motion perception.