Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Growers' Adoption of USDA GAP, Other Harmonized GAP & Group Produce Audits: Drivers, Constraints, and Fostering
Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi1, Leslie D Bourquin2
1Department of Earth, Environment, and Geographical Sciences, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI 49855, USA.
Abstract:
The USDA, with produce sector stakeholders, developed voluntary fee-for-service food safety audit schemes- USDA GAP&GHP, USDA Harmonized GAP (HGAP), USDA HGAP Plus+, and USDA GroupGAP- to help growers verify compliance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Aligned with produce safety regulatory requirements and designed to vary in scope and complexity, the schemes aim to meet diverse grower and buyer needs. For unclear reasons, growers' adoption of USDA GAP audit schemes remains low relative to private standards. So, using data from growers (n = 208 surveyed) and service providers (n = 55 surveyed, 7 interviewed), we explored factors influencing growers' implementation of USDA GAP programs. Buyers' requests and food safety requirements were key drivers of adoption. However, many growers cited a lack of buyers' demand for USDA GAP schemes, a key barrier to broader adoption. Small- and medium-scale growers also face technical and financial challenges inhibiting adoption, which could be addressed by government, private sector, and nonprofit stakeholders. Implementing USDA GAPs must be profitable for small growers, highlighting the need to align adoption efforts with USDA's broader strategy to connect them to profitable markets. Negative audit experiences and concerns about nonconformities escalating to the FDA deter adoption. Enhancing outreach, education, and trust through Cooperative Extension and regional networks is crucial for improved understanding, acceptance, and adoption of USDA GAP schemes. The findings call for coordinated multi-stakeholder efforts to address the economic, informational, and perceptual barriers through targeted, multipronged interventions.
More Related Videos
14:29The Hawaii Protocol for Scientific Monitoring of Coffee Berry Borer: a Model for Coffee Agroecosystems Worldwide
Published on: March 19, 2018
05:55High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize (Zea mays L.)
Published on: June 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology
Microorganisms in Agriculture and Food industry
Sources of Food Contamination
Good Manufacturing Practices
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)