Repurposing tranexamic acid as an anticancer drug: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Karoline Assifuah Kristjansen1,2, Nulvin Djebbara-Bozo3, Kumanan Rune Nanthan4

  • 1Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. karoline_kristjansen@clin.au.dk.

Abstract

Insights

Drug repurposing offers new cancer treatments. Tranexamic acid (TXA) shows promise, reducing tumor growth, viability, and invasiveness in preclinical studies, suggesting potential as a repurposed cancer drug.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Drug Repurposing

Background:

  • Drug repurposing is a viable strategy for discovering novel cancer therapeutics.
  • Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, influences pathways critical to tumor progression, including proliferation, angiogenesis, and inflammation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the anticancer effects of Tranexamic acid (TXA).
  • To assess TXA's potential as a repurposed cancer drug through in vitro, animal, and clinical studies.

Main Methods:

  • A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.
  • Literature search across major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library).
  • Inclusion of in vitro, animal, and clinical studies on TXA or epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA); critical appraisal and meta-analysis of low-risk bias studies.

Main Results:

  • 38 articles were included, encompassing 41 in vitro, 34 animal, and 7 clinical studies.
  • Meta-analysis of 9 animal studies demonstrated a significant reduction in tumor growth with TXA treatment (SMD -1.0, p=0.0002).
  • In vitro studies consistently showed reduced tumor cell proliferation, viability, and invasiveness upon TXA exposure; clinical studies had high bias.

Conclusions:

  • Tranexamic acid (TXA) exhibits potential as a repurposed anticancer agent.
  • Preclinical evidence (in vitro and animal models) indicates TXA reduces tumor growth, viability, and invasiveness.
  • Further high-quality clinical trials are needed due to bias in existing human studies.