Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

4.8K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CYSTSCAN-PKD: a comprehensive pipeline for automatic cyst segmentation and counting on µCT scans from PKD animal models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Imaging post-reperfusion metabolism in porcine myocardial infarction with hyperpolarized <sup>13</sup>C pyruvate MRI.

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance·2026
Same author

Peristomal Pyoderma Gangrenosum Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Study.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2026
Same author

Remote Patient Education for People Living with an Ostomy: An Italian Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Method.

Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy)·2026
Same author

Hyperpolarized MRI Detects Increased [1-<sup>13</sup>C]Pyruvate Metabolism in Early Liver Regeneration.

NMR in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Pulmonary and cerebral damage in COVID-19 survivors: is there any association?

Annals of medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.2K

Multi-center and multi-vendor evaluation study across 1.5 T and 3 T scanners (part 1): apparent diffusion coefficient

Siria Pasini1, Steffen Ringgaard2, Tau Vendelboe2

  • 1Bioengineering Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Camozzi 3, 24020, Ranica, BG, Italy.

Magma (New York, N.Y.)
|May 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Diffusion MRI scanner performance was validated using a phantom. Measurements showed high accuracy and repeatability, supporting scanner evaluation for renal studies.

Keywords:
Apparent diffusion coefficientMRIMulti-sitePhantomStandardization

More Related Videos

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
10:26

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Published on: June 2, 2015

17.0K
Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents
08:59

Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents

Published on: April 15, 2016

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2025

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
06:33

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

11.2K
A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
10:26

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis

Published on: June 2, 2015

17.0K
Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents
08:59

Use of a Multi-compartment Dynamic Single Enzyme Phantom for Studies of Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Agents

Published on: April 15, 2016

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Diffusion MRI
  • Quantitative Imaging

Background:

  • Diffusion MRI enables quantitative measurements of tissue microstructure.
  • Standardization is crucial for multi-site and multi-vendor diffusion MRI studies.
  • The QIBA/NIST phantom provides a reliable tool for validating MRI measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate multi-site and multi-vendor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements.
  • To assess the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of ADC measurements using the QIBA/NIST phantom.
  • To evaluate scanner performance at different field strengths (1.5T and 3T) and from various vendors.

Main Methods:

  • ADC measurements were performed on 12 MRI scanners from three vendors across five sites.
  • Pearson's correlation and accuracy error were used to compare measurements with reference values.
  • Intra-scanner (CVintra) and inter-scanner (CVinter) coefficients of variation were calculated for repeatability and agreement.
  • Bland-Altman plots and precision error assessed short-term reproducibility.
  • Generalized linear mixed models were employed to compare performance across field strengths, vendors, and scanners.

Main Results:

  • Temperature-adjusted ADCs showed excellent correlation with NIST reference values (r > 0.996).
  • Median accuracy error was below 5% across all scanners.
  • In the renal physiologic range, accuracy error was <10% and intra-scanner CV was <2%.
  • Short-term reproducibility demonstrated limits of agreement <10%, with median inter-scanner CV <2%.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative diffusion MRI parameters obtained using the QIBA/NIST phantom are accurate, repeatable, and precise.
  • The findings support the feasibility of using the QIBA standardization process for diffusion MRI scanner evaluation in renal studies.
  • Room temperature measurements with abdominal receive coils yield results consistent with literature values.