Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Differences in Expert Perspectives on AI Training in Medical Education: Secondary Analysis of a Multinational Delphi
Qi Chwen Ong1,2, Chin-Siang Ang3, Nai Ming Lai4
1School of Public Health, Imperial College London, White City Campus, 90 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom, 44 20-7589-511.
Experts in lower-income nations are less likely to mandate artificial intelligence (AI) learning outcomes in medical education compared to those in high-income countries. This disparity highlights global inequalities in AI medical training and the need for flexible competency frameworks.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Global Health Equity
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare, necessitating AI literacy among medical professionals.
- Existing medical education curricula may not adequately address AI competencies, particularly in resource-limited settings.
- Global disparities in access to technology and training exacerbate inequalities in AI education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze global expert opinions on the mandatory inclusion of artificial intelligence (AI) learning outcomes in preregistration medical education.
- To identify differences in these opinions between experts from high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
- To explore the implications of these differences for developing equitable AI competency frameworks in medical training.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a multinational Delphi study involving medical education experts.
- Comparative analysis of expert recommendations regarding AI learning outcomes based on country income levels (HIC vs. LMIC).
- Qualitative assessment of factors influencing expert opinions on AI integration in medical curricula.
Main Results:
- Experts from LMICs were significantly less likely than those from HICs to consider AI learning outcomes mandatory in preregistration medical education.
- This trend suggests a potential gap in the perceived importance or feasibility of AI education in resource-constrained environments.
- The findings underscore variations in the adoption and prioritization of AI in medical training globally.
Conclusions:
- Global inequalities in medical AI education are evident, with LMIC experts showing less emphasis on mandatory AI learning outcomes.
- There is a critical need for adaptable and inclusive AI competency frameworks to address these disparities.
- Future efforts should focus on equitable AI training strategies to ensure all healthcare professionals are prepared for an AI-driven future.
More Related Videos
08:27Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: October 28, 2021
05:04Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: