Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

09:06
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: January 9, 2019
13.8K
Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing
Dietmar M Wohlbauer1, Charles B Hem2, Caylin McCallick3
1Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, 02114, MA, USA; Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department for Audiology, Boston, 02114, MA, USA.
Hearing Research
|May 10, 2025
Summary
Cochlear implants can be improved by adjusting stimulation strategies to reduce channel interactions. Some users, particularly those with poorer performance, may benefit from focused stimulation, though results vary individually.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CI) aim to restore hearing but face challenges in speech-in-noise understanding.
- Channel interactions in CI reduce signal accuracy, hindering complex auditory perception.
- Optimized CI programming strategies, like focused stimulation, can mitigate these issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the combined effects of channel deactivation and focused dynamic tripolar stimulation in cochlear implant users.
- To evaluate speech perception in quiet and noise using different CI programming strategies.
- To assess the influence of individual factors on speech performance with optimized CI settings.
Main Methods:
- Developed three CI programs using an automatic channel selection algorithm based on focused detection thresholds.
- Programs varied in the proportion of channels using focused stimulation, monopolar, or dynamic focused modes.
- Tested 13 ears in 11 adult CI users (Advanced Bionics HiRes90k) on vowel and sentence recognition.
Main Results:
- Individual improvements in vowel and sentence perception were observed with focused stimulation compared to monopolar programming.
- Benefits of focused listening were more pronounced in CI users with less experience and poorer clinical performance.
- No significant group-level improvements were found, indicating substantial inter-individual variability.
Conclusions:
- Deactivating and focusing specific CI channels may enhance speech performance for certain individuals, especially those with lower baseline performance.
- Reduced channel interactions are a likely mechanism for observed improvements.
- Individual variability in CI performance necessitates personalized programming approaches.
Keywords:
Channel deactivationCochlear implantDynamic focusingSentence perceptionVowel identification
