Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

468
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
468

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental Representations of Impossible Non-Euclidean Environments.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Collaborative Navigation Improves Spatial Learning Across Symmetric and Asymmetric Locomotion in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Local spatial navigation or "steering" in patients with vestibular loss in a virtual reality environment.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2023
Same author

Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

The influence of environmental geometry and spatial symmetry on spatial updating during locomotion.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same author

Bayesian decision theory and navigation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Processing spatial cue conflict in navigation: Distance estimation.

Xiaoli Chen1, Yingyan Chen1, Timothy P McNamara2

  • 1Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.

Cognitive Psychology
|May 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Navigating with conflicting cues is complex. Explicitly recognizing landmark instability, not just cue conflict, significantly impairs spatial localization by reducing landmark reliance.

Keywords:
Bayesian modelsCausal inferenceCue conflictCue integrationPath integrationSpatial cognitionSpatial navigation

More Related Videos

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition
  • Human Navigation

Background:

  • Spatial navigation relies on integrating multiple environmental cues.
  • Cue conflict, such as between landmarks and optic flow, presents challenges to accurate spatial perception.
  • Understanding how the brain resolves conflicting spatial information is crucial for navigation research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of cue conflict, specifically between landmarks and optic flow, on spatial navigation.
  • To determine the role of explicit awareness of cue instability in modulating navigation strategies.
  • To compare the explanatory power of Bayesian causal inference (BCI) and sensory disparity models in explaining navigation under cue conflict.

Main Methods:

  • Participants estimated spatial distances under varying levels of landmark-optic flow cue conflict.
  • Experimental conditions included minimal conflict, large conflict, and large conflict with explicit awareness of landmark instability.
  • Cognitive models, including a Bayesian causal inference (BCI) model, were fitted to behavioral data to elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Increased cue conflict alone had minimal impact; explicit awareness of landmark instability significantly reduced landmark reliance and spatial localization precision.
  • The BCI model better explained the data, identifying reduced reliance through increased sensory noise and decreased weighting of unstable landmarks.
  • Cue weighting depended on perceived causal origins: bottom-up reliability for same-cause judgments and top-down metacognitive evaluation for different-cause judgments.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit awareness of cue instability is a critical factor in navigation, overriding simple cue conflict.
  • The Bayesian causal inference (BCI) model effectively captures the mechanisms of cue integration and resolution under conflict.
  • Findings reveal sophisticated cue weighting strategies influenced by both sensory reliability and metacognitive assessments, offering insights into navigation and cognitive modeling.