Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.4K

Medical Physics 3.0 approach to optimizing image quality in a breast screening program.

Elizabeth Keavey1, Paola Baldelli2, Gillian Power2

  • 1BreastCheck, National Cancer Screening Service, Galway, Ireland.

Medical Physics
|May 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adapting mammography DRLs for improved usability.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same author

A scoping review of programme specific mammographic breast density related guidelines and practices within breast screening programmes.

European journal of radiology open·2023
Same author

Consensus Review of Discordant Imaging Findings after the Introduction of Digital Screening Mammography: Irish National Breast Cancer Screening Program Experience.

Radiology·2020
Same author

A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018
Same author

Quality Controls in Digital Mammography protocol of the EFOMP Mammo Working group.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2018
Same author

Do women with dense breasts have higher radiation dose during screening mammography?

The breast journal·2018
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Optimizing mammography quality control using Medical Physics 3.0 principles improved image quality and cancer detection rates. This approach ensures consistent, high-quality breast cancer screening for all women.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Mammography image quality (IQ) is crucial for screening sensitivity and specificity.
  • Current quality control (QC) metrics do not always correlate with clinical performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Apply Medical Physics 3.0 principles to integrate QC with clinical outcomes.
  • Optimize breast cancer screening quality within a national program.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 1.5 million mammograms.
  • Correlated cancer detection rate (CDR) with IQ and mean glandular dose (MGD).
  • Adjusted operational dose multiplier for new mammography systems.

Main Results:

  • Increased MGD by 19% and improved IQ by 12% for new systems.
Keywords:
breast screeningcancer detection rateoptimization

More Related Videos

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.3K
Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
08:32

Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model

Published on: October 2, 2020

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
06:50

Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization

Published on: March 3, 2023

1.4K
X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
08:30

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging

Published on: September 11, 2011

14.3K
Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
08:32

Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model

Published on: October 2, 2020

6.0K
  • Observed convergence in CDR between system types after optimization.
  • Medical physics metrics showed improved performance.

    • Conclusions:

    • Medical Physics 3.0 integration enhances quality assurance.
    • Optimized screening quality benefits individual women and the population.
    • Data-driven QC improves breast cancer screening outcomes.