Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

On-Chip Endothelial Inflammatory Phenotyping
Published on: July 21, 2012
Comparative analysis of systemic inflammatory biomarkers on dipper and non-dipper hypertension phenotypes
Mehmet Özyaşar1, Tolga Memioğlu2
1Konya City Hospital Cardiology Department, Karatay, Konya, Turkey.
Insights
Hypertension patterns, dipper and non-dipper, are linked to systemic inflammation. Non-dipper hypertension is associated with elevated inflammatory markers, with the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) showing the strongest predictive value.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Immunology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Circadian blood pressure (BP) patterns, specifically dipper and non-dipper phenotypes, are associated with cardiovascular risk.
- Systemic inflammation is implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension and its complications.
- Understanding the relationship between hypertension phenotypes and inflammatory markers is crucial for risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between hypertension circadian patterns (dipper vs. non-dipper) and various inflammatory biomarkers.
- To identify specific inflammatory indices that can predict non-dipper hypertension.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cross-sectional study of 160 newly diagnosed, untreated hypertensive patients.
- Classification into dipper and non-dipper groups based on 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.
- Analysis of inflammatory indices derived from complete blood counts, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI).
Main Results:
- Non-dipper patients exhibited significantly higher 24-hour, awake, and sleep BP compared to dippers.
- Non-dippers showed significantly elevated levels of white blood cells, neutrophils, NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI.
- Logistic regression and ROC analysis revealed that dNLR had the highest predictive value for non-dipper hypertension.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in inflammatory status exist between dipper and non-dipper hypertensive patients.
- Inflammatory biomarkers, particularly dNLR, are strongly correlated with and predictive of non-dipper hypertension.
- Routine screening of inflammatory markers may aid in early identification of high-risk hypertensive patients.
Abstract:
Circadian hypertension patterns, classified as dipper and non-dipper, influence cardiovascular risk and are linked to systemic inflammation. This study aimed to examine the relationship between hypertension phenotypes and inflammatory biomarkers. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 160 hypertensive patients with elevated office blood pressure (BP) who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and were categorized into dipper and non-dipper groups. Inclusion criteria comprised newly diagnosed, untreated individuals without hematological disorders, chronic inflammatory conditions, active infections, or moderate to severe chronic kidney disease. Inflammatory indices derived from complete blood counts were analyzed alongside demographic and clinical data. The cohort consisted of 79 dippers and 81 non-dippers, with a mean age of 46 ± 5 ± 11 ± 1 years. Non-dippers were more likely to be smokers (P = .006) and exhibited significantly higher 24-hour, awake, and sleep systolic BPs and sleep diastolic BPs than dippers (P = .001, P = .003, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). Non-dippers also had elevated white blood cell counts, neutrophil (NEU) levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) scores (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, P = .002, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively), while dippers exhibited higher lymphocyte counts (P < .001). Logistic regression analyses indicated that NLR, dNLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI scores significantly predicted the inflammatory status of non-dipper hypertensive patients. Notably, dNLR demonstrated the highest specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve values in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. This study identified significant differences in inflammatory status between dipper and non-dipper hypertensive groups, with inflammatory biomarkers strongly correlating with non-dipper hypertension. The dNLR score exhibited the strongest predictive value for non-dipper hypertension. Routine screening of inflammatory markers in clinical practice could facilitate early identification of at-risk patients and potentially improve treatment outcomes. However, further research is needed to validate these findings.
More Related Videos
07:20Dried Blood Spot Collection of Health Biomarkers to Maximize Participation in Population Studies
Published on: January 28, 2014
09:20Intracellular Staining and Flow Cytometry to Identify Lymphocyte Subsets within Murine Aorta, Kidney and Lymph Nodes in a Model of Hypertension
Published on: January 28, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Measurement of Blood Pressure